Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;79(4):455–462. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01083-3

Table 2.

Efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide ER 32 mg as a single IA injection in patients with pain from osteoarthritis of the knee in a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial; data are least square means [28]

Endpoint TA-ER
(n = 161)
PL
(n = 162)
BGD TA-ER vs. PL
(95% CI)
TA-CS
(n = 161)
BGD TA-ER vs. TA-CS
(95% CI)
Key endpointsa
 ADP change from BL at week 12 − 3.12 − 2.14 − 0.98 (− 1.47, − 0.49)*** − 2.86 − 0.26 (− 0.74, 0.23)
 AUEweek1–12 − 247.3 − 145.3 − 102.0 (− 136.8, − 67.3)*** − 231.9 − 15.3 (− 49.8, 19.2)
 AUEweek1–24 − 432.5 − 297.0 − 135.5 (− 205.9, − 65.2)**b NA NA
Exploratory endpointsc
 WOMAC-A (pain) NA NA − 0.37 (− 0.55, − 0.20)*** NA − 0.17 (− 0.34, − 0.00)*
 WOMAC-B (stiffness) − 0.44 (− 0.63, − 0.25)*** − 0.23 (− 0.42, − 0.04)*
 WOMAC-C (physical function) − 0.38 (− 0.54, − 0.21)*** − 0.22 (− 0.38, − 0.05)*
 KOOS-QOL + 8.97 (+ 4.37, + 13.57)*** + 5.42 (+ 0.78, + 10.06)*

ADP average daily pain, AUE area under effect, BGD between group difference, BL baseline, CI confidence interval, CS crystalline suspension, ER extended-release, IA intra-articular, KOOS-QOL Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life, LSM least squares mean, NA not available, PL placebo, TA triamcinolone acetonide, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001 vs. PL

aPrimary endpoint: LSM change from BL to week 12 in ADP with TA-ER vs. PL in the full analysis set. Secondary endpoints (in step-down order): AUEweek1–12 TA-ER vs. PL; AUEweek1–12 TA-ER vs. TA-CS; ADP change from BL to week 12 vs. TA-CS; and AUEweek1–24 TA-ER vs. PL

bp-value considered informative only as the previous comparison in step-down testing (AUEweek1–12 for TA-ER vs. TA-CS) was not significant

cData recorded at week 12