Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;10(2):509–522. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0572-z

Table 3.

Changes in glycaemic variability profiles for MAGE, CONGA-1, 2, 4 and 8 during the study and comparisons between treatments

Variable RT-CGM (n = 9) Blinded CGM (n = 6) P value (ANCOVA)
Baseline 12 weeks Change Baseline 12 weeks Change
CONGA-1 (mmol/L) 1.30 ± 0.36 1.03 ± 0.36 − 0.27 ± 0.36 1.24 ± 0.41 1.30 ± 0.48 0.06 ± 0.19 0.074
CONGA-2 (mmol/L) 1.72 ± 0.51 1.36 ± 0.55 − 0.36 ± 0.54 1.79 ± 0.633 1.84 ± 0.77 0.05 ± 2.88 0.110
CONGA-4 (mmol/L) 2.02 ± 0.68 1.58 ± 0.75 − 0.44 ± 0.67 2.18 ± 0.74 2.16 ± 0.93 − 0.02 ± 0.42 0.186
CONGA-8 (mmol/L) 2.09 ± 0.68 1.73 ± 0.83 − 0.36 ± 0.61 2.25 ± 0.73 2.22 ± 0.95 − 0.02 ± 0.52 0.298
MAGE (mmol/L) 3.69 ± 1.08 3.01 ± 1.44 − 0.69 ± 1.14 4.06 ± 1.23 4.05 ± 1.61 − 0.09 ± 0.80 0.250

Total analysed n = 15 (RT-CGM 9, blinded CGM 6). Missing glucose data due to device recording or sensor insertion error. All values are mean ± SD unless otherwise stated

RT-CGM real-time continuous glucose monitoring, Blinded CGM blinded continuous glucose monitoring, CONGA-1 continuous overall net glycaemic action of observations 1 h apart, CONGA-2 continuous overall net glycaemic action of observations 2-h apart, CONGA-4 continuous overall net glycaemic action of observations 4 h apart, CONGA-8 continuous overall net glycaemic action of observations 8 h apart, MAGE mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions