Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 27;5:2055207619839883. doi: 10.1177/2055207619839883

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Author
Year
Country
Setting/workplace Study design Participants Type of mHealth technology/toola Intervention Control/comparison group(s) Aim Primary PA/SB outcome(s) (OB or SR) Secondary outcome(s) Length of follow-up
Brakenridge et al. 2016 (protocol)37
Brakenridge et al. 2016 (results)38
Australia
International property and infrastructure group (Lendlease) Cluster RCT n = 153
54% M, 46% F
Age
IG: 37.6±7.8
CG: 40.0±8.0
Office workers (at least 0.5 FTE)
Wearable activity monitor and smartphone app Waist-worn ‘LUMOback’ activity monitor (LUMO Bodytech, USA) and associated smartphone app with organisational support. Organisational support only – e.g. manager support, e-mails and educational materials. SB Average time per day spent sitting (work hours and overall)
(OB, activPAL3™ accelerometer)
Average time per day spent in prolonged sitting bouts (30 min or more), standing and stepping
Daily steps
Average time period between sitting bouts
Job performance, job control and work satisfactionStress, physical and mental health-related QoL
Activity monitor usage
12 months
Finkelstein et al. 2015 (protocol and baseline data)39
Finkelstein et al. 2016 (results)40
Singapore
13 organisations (various industries and government sectors) RCT (4-arm) n = 800
46% M, 54% F
Age
IG1: 35.4±8.3
IG2: 35.5±8.6
IG3: 35.5±8.4
CG: 35.6±8.6
Mostly desk-based employees (full-time)
Wearable activity monitor (and website) Waist-worn Fitbit Zip activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) and associated website.Monetary incentives:
IG1 = Fitbit only
IG2 = Fitbit and charity donation
IG3 = Fitbit and cash
Educational booklets on PA.
No activity monitor or incentives.
Educational booklets on PA only.
PA MVPA bout minutes per week
(OB, ActiGraph™ GT-3x+ accelerometer)
Mean daily step count
% of participants meeting 70,000 weekly step goal
Weight
Systolic BP
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Quality of life
Weekly step count
Sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous PA (min/week)
Participants meeting 150 min per week moderate PA
Participants meeting 10,000 daily step target
12 months
Ganesan et al. 201641
64 countries (majority of participants from India (90.2%), Australia (5%), New Zealand (1.1%) and Singapore (0.6%))
481 employers (private and public sector organisations) in 1481 cities Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled) n = 69,219
76% M, 24% F
Age
36.0±8.4
Adult employees
Smartphone app Non-interactive pedometer and ‘Stepathlon’ mobile app (also available as website). No control or comparison group PA + SB Daily steps
(SR, pedometer data entered by participants)
Number of exercise days/week
Exercise duration (<30 or ≥30 min/day)
Sitting duration (hours/day)
Weight in kilograms
100 days (approx.)
Gilson et al. 2016 (baseline data and smartphone use)55
Gilson et al. 2017 (results)56 Australia
Two large Australian haulage companies Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled feasibility study) n = 44
100% M, 0% F
Age 47.0±10.1
Truck drivers
Wearable activity monitor and smartphone app Wrist-worn Jawbone UP activity monitor (Jawbone, USA) used with associated smartphone app.
Monetary incentives (vouchers for attaining step goals and logging diet)
No control or comparison group PA + SB Proportions of work time and non-work time spent physically active, sedentary and stationary + (i.e. sitting with upper limb movement or standing)
(OB – GENEActiv™ wrist accelerometer)
Workday diet (fruit, vegetable, saturated fat and sugar intake)
Engagement with the intervention
Qualitative outcomes (interviews) –driver and depot manager experiences; perceived impact of the intervention; barriers to PA
28 weeks (approx.)
Gremaud et al. 201860 USA Academic organisation (university) RCT n = 146
25% M, 75% F
Age
IG: 40.6±11.7
CG: 40.3±11.1
Sedentary office workers (full-time)
Wearable activity monitor and smartphone app (web-based) Waist-worn Fitbit Zip activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) used with ‘MapTrek’ app for gamified walking. Activity monitor only PA + SB Daily steps
Daily active minutes (minutes with ≥100 steps/min)
(OB – data from Fitbit)
Bouts of sedentary behaviour (consecutive minutes with 0 steps) 10 weeks
Jones 201642 USA Academic medical centre (Wake Forest Baptist Health) Prospective cluster trial (with asynchronous control group) n = 47
18% M, 82% F
Age
Overall mean = 50.8, range 25 to 74 years (SD not reported)
Sedentary employees
Wearable activity monitor (and computer software) Clip-on Fitbit One activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) and associated software, with wellness education.
IG1 = Fitbit only
IG2 = Fitbit and shared active workstations
Usual treatment (blinded activity monitors for data collection) PA + SB Daily steps
Daily sedentary time
BMI
(OB – steps and sedentary time from Fitbit. BMI assessed objectively)
Life satisfaction
Anxiety (state and trait)
Health-related quality of life
Self-reported sleep patterns
6 months
Koyle 201343 USA Academic medical centre (University of Utah Health Care) RCT n = 73
0% M, 100% F
Age
46.5±7.6
Physically inactive employees (<150 min exercise per week)
Smartphone app with integrated accelerometer (and motivational text messages) ‘Adidas miCoach’ smartphone app to track walking exercise.
Educational materials on PA.
Tailored motivational text messages.
Smartphone app and educational materials (same as intervention group). No motivational text messages. PA Walking distance and duration
(OB – smartphone app-integrated accelerometer for collection of PA data)
Walking for exercise self-efficacy beliefs
Likeliness of participating in other forms of PA beyond walking
Height and weight (BMI)
Resting pulse rate
Systolic BP
Qualitative experiences of the intervention (survey)
6 weeks
Losina et al. 201757 USA Academic medical centre (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts) Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled feasibility study) n = 292
17% M, 83% F
Age 38±11
Sedentary, non-clinician hospital employees
Wearable activity monitor (linked with websites) Wrist-worn Fitbit Flex activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) used with Fitbit website and study website for monitoring PA and progress.
Monetary incentives (individual and team) for meeting PA goals.
No control or comparison group PA Average weekly minutes of MVPA
Proportion of participants meeting weekly MVPA goals and CDC PA guidelines
(OB – step data from Fitbit converted to weekly minutes of MVPA)
Fitbit wear adherence (number of weeks wearing Fitbit for ≥10 h/day and ≥4 days/week)
Participant satisfaction with programme
26 weeks (including two pre-intervention weeks)
Neil-Sztramko et al. 201758 Canada Multiple workplaces in Greater Vancouver (nursing, emergency services, casinos and airport) Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled feasibility study) n = 20
0% M, 100% F
Age 42.2±8.6
Female shift workers
Wearable activity monitor and smartphone app (or website) Wrist-worn Fitbit Flex activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) used with Fitbit app and/or website.
Distance-based behavioural counselling (telephone/online)
No control or comparison group PA MVPA (total min/week and min/week bouts ≥10 mins)
(OB - ActiGraph™ GT-3x+ accelerometer)
Daily steps
Sedentary time (min/week bouts ≥10 mins)
Self-reported PA and sedentary timeBody weight and BMI
Physical and mental health-related QoL
Sleep quantity and quality
Feasibility outcomes: demand (reach and recruitment), implementation (delivery and resources) and acceptability (attrition and adherence to intervention, participant satisfaction).
12 weeks
Olsen et al. 201861 Australia Financial services organisation (Brisbane) Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled pilot) n = 49
31% M, 69% Fb
Age 39.5±8.7
Flexible workers (e.g. work from home 1 day/week)
Wearable activity monitor and smartphone app Wrist-worn Jawbone activity monitor (Jawbone, USA) used with associated app.
Group-based action planning session.
Weekly e-mail reminders and resources.
Healthy living seminar
No control or comparison group SB Sitting time (including overall and occupational, min/day)
(OB - ActiGraph™ GT-3x+ accelerometer, also self-reported sitting time assessed using adapted version of Workforce Sitting Questionnaire)
Light PA and MVPA (min/day, accelerometer-assessed)
Self-reported PA (min/week, assessed using adapted version of Active Australia survey)
Acceptability of the intervention (survey-assessed)
6 weeks
Patel et al. 201644 (study 1) USA Academic organisation (University of Pennsylvania) RCT (4-arm) n = 281 (279 completed baseline assessment)
22% M, 78% F
Age
IG1: 37.1±10.9
IG2: 40.3±11.2
IG3: 41.9±11.6
CG: 39.4±12.2
Overweight and obese employees (BMI ≥27 kg/m2)
Smartphone app with integrated accelerometer ‘Moves’ smartphone app (Proto Geo Oy, Finland) for step tracking.
Daily feedback on steps.
Monetary incentives:
IG1 = gain incentive
IG2 = lottery incentive
IG3 = loss incentive
Smartphone app and daily feedback (as intervention group). No financial incentives. PA Proportion of participant-days 7000 step goal achieved during intervention
(OB – smartphone app-integrated accelerometer)
Proportion of participant-days 7000 step goal achieved during follow-up
Daily steps – intervention and follow-up
26 weeks
Patel et al. 201645 (study 2) USA Health insurance organisation (Independence Blue Cross) RCT (4-arm) n = 304
23% M, 77% F
Age
IG1: 39.3±10.2
IG2: 38.7±10.2
IG3:41.2±10.8
CG: 43.2±10.0
Mostly sedentary employees
Smartphone app with integrated accelerometer ‘Moves’ smartphone app (Proto Geo Oy, Finland) for step tracking.
Daily feedback on steps.
Monetary incentives:
IG1 = individual
IG2 = team
IG3 = combined
Smartphone app and daily feedback (as intervention group). No financial incentives. PA Proportion of participant-days 7000 step goal achieved during intervention
(OB – smartphone app-integrated accelerometer)
Proportion of participant-days 7000 step goal achieved during follow-up
Daily steps – intervention and follow-up
26 weeks
Patel et al. 201862 USA Academic organisation (University of Pennsylvania) RCT (4 arm) n = 209
23% M, 77% F
Age
IG1: 41.2±11.1
IG2: 40.6±10.5
IG3: 42.9±10.3
CG: 40.0±11.0
Overweight and obese employees (BMI ≥27 kg/m2)
Smartphone app with integrated accelerometer ‘Moves’ smartphone app (Proto Geo Oy, Finland) for step tracking.
Daily feedback on steps.
Monetary incentives:
IG1 = higher frequency, smaller reward lottery
IG2 = jackpot lottery
IG3 = combined lottery
Smartphone app and daily feedback (as intervention group). No financial incentives. PA Proportion of participant-days 7000 step goal achieved during intervention
(OB – smartphone app-integrated accelerometer)
Proportion of participant-days 7000 step goal achieved during follow-up
Daily steps – intervention and follow-up
26 weeks
Poirier et al. 201646 USA Wellbeing improvement company (Healthways Inc) RCT n = 265
34% M, 66% F
Age
IG: 40.3±11.4
CG: 39.6±12.0
Headquarter-based employees
Wearable activity monitor (linked with website, and optional text messages) Hip- or shoe-worn Pebble+ activity monitor (Fitlinxx Inc, USA) used with ‘Walkadoo’ internet-based program. Electronic messaging. One week of blinded activity monitor wear, then instructed to maintain their usual activity routine. PA Daily steps
(OB – activity monitor and website)
Proportion of participants increasing steps by 1000/day
Engagement with intervention – wear time, e-mail opening and website visits
6 weeks
Reijonsaari et al. 2009 (protocol)47
Reijonsaari et al. 2012 (results)48 Finland
Insurance company RCT n = 544 (521 included in analysis)
36% M, 64% F
Age
IG: 43±10.0
CG: 44±10.0
Mainly clerical employees (working ≥8 h per week)
Wearable activity monitor (linked with website) Belt-worn ‘AM 200’ activity monitor/ accelerometer (PAM BV, Netherlands) used with associated website.
Educational materials on PA. Written results of fitness tests.
Distance counselling (telephone/online)
Educational materials on PA. Written results of fitness tests. PA Weekly MET-minutes of total activity
Work productivity
Sickness absence
(SR – MET-minutes from IPAQ, productivity from QQ instrument but objective sickness absence data)
Body weight (kg)
Waist circumference (cm)
Body fat percentage
Systolic and diastolic BP (mmHg)
Aerobic fitness (maximal oxygen uptake, VO2 max, ml/kg/min)
12 months
Reed et al. 201863 Canada Tertiary care cardiovascular institute (University of Ottawa Heart Institute) Parallel-group randomised trial (3-arm) n = 76
3% M, 97% F
Age 46.3±10.9
Nurses
Wearable activity monitor (linked with website) Ankle-worn Tractivity® activity monitor (Tractivity®, Vancouver, BC) linked with website for monitoring PA and taking part in challenges:
IG1 = individual challenge
IG2 = friend challenge
IG3 = team challenge
No control or comparison group PA MVPA (weekly minutes in bouts ≥10 mins)
Daily steps
(OB – data from Tractivity® activity monitor)
Body mass (kg)
BMI
Waist circumference
Body fat %
Resting systolic BP
6 weeks
Rowe-Roberts et al. 201449 Australia Private healthcare and insurance company (Australian Unity group) Prospective cohort (uncontrolled pilot) n = 212
38% M, 62% F
Age
42% under 35
35% 35-44
15% 45-54
8% 55+
Adult employees
Wearable activity monitor Waist-worn Fitbit Ultra activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) No control or comparison group PA Daily steps
(OB – step data from Fitbit)
AUSDRISK (Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool) score
Engagement with intervention (activity monitor wear)
Qualitative outcomes (survey and focus groups) – experiences, engagement and activity, preferred motivational strategies
7 months
Schrager et al. 201750 USA Academic emergency medicine residency Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled pilot) n = 30
53% M, 47% F
Age
Median 28 years (IQR = 4.0)
Physicians on a single site
Wearable activity monitor and smartphone app (or website) Wrist-worn Fitbit Flex activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) used with Fitbit app and/or website No control or comparison group PA Days per week with ≥30 min PA
(SR)
Days per week with ≥10,000 steps or ≥30 min of active time (as measured by Fitbit at one month)
Qualitative outcomes (survey) – adoption and use of device, measures of wellness, changes in PA behaviour
6 months
Simons et al. 2018 (app development and feasibility)64
Simons et al. 2018 (results of RCT)65
Belgium
Multiple workplaces in Flanders, Belgium (including retail, catering, social employment and factories) Study 2, 2018b = Cluster RCT (study 1, 2018a was a qualitative evaluation and impact on PA/SB not reported) n = 130 (29 clusters)
49% M, 51% F
Age
IG: 24.8±3.1
CG: 25.1±3.0
Lower educated (i.e. no university or college degree) working young adults, not meeting PA guidelines at baseline (<150 min MVPA/week)
Wearable activity monitor and smartphone app Wrist-worn Fitbit Charge activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) used with ‘Active Coach’ app for monitoring PA Educational brochure on PA only (generic information) PA Daily minutes of light, moderate and vigorous intensity PA
(OB - ActiGraph™ GT-3x+ accelerometer)
Daily steps (from Fitbit)
Self-reported context-specific PA (IPAQ)
Psychosocial variables: social support, attitude (perceived benefits and barriers), self-efficacy, knowledge and intentions
Engagement: usage statisticsProcess evaluation interviews: Opinions on Fitbit and app (e.g. usability, preferred features)
21 weeks
Skogstad et al. 201651 Norway Road maintenance enterprise Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled) n = 121
64% M, 36% F
Age
M = 41.8±12.0
F = 42.6±12.5
24% road workers, 76% office workers
Wearable activity monitor (linked with website) Wrist-worn Tappa® activity monitor/ accelerometer used with associated website (Dytt®) for step tracking.Rewards given for best performances. No control or comparison group PA Weekly exercise frequency and duration
(SR)
Aerobic fitness (maximal oxygen uptake, VO2 max, ml/kg/min)
Systolic and diastolic BP (mm Hg)
Resting heart rate
Lipids (total, HDL and LDL cholesterol)
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
8 weeks (approx.)
Slootmaker et al. 200952 Netherlands 8 worksites surrounding Amsterdam (mainly office settings) RCT n = 102
40% M, 60% F
Age
IG: 32.5±3.4
CG: 31.2±3.5
Mainly office workers
Wearable activity monitor (linked with website) Belt-worn ‘AM 101’ activity monitor/ accelerometer (PAM BV, Netherlands) used with associated website (PAM COACH). Educational booklet on PA only PA + SB Weekly PA and sedentary time – weekly minutes of light, moderate and vigorous intensity activity and sedentary minutes
(SR – assessed by the AQuAA questionnaire)
Self-reported determinants of PA – including behavioural intention, attitude, social influence, self-efficacy, knowledge of PA recommendations
Aerobic fitness (maximal oxygen uptake, VO2 max, ml/kg/min)
Body composition – body weight and height (BMI), waist and hip circumference, skin fold thickness (% body fat)
8 months
Thorndike et al. 201453 USA Healthcare organisation (Massachusetts General Hospital) Phase 1 = RCT Phase 2 = team-based prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled) n = 104
46% M, 54% F
Age
Mean and range (SD not reported)
IG: 29 (23–36)
CG: 29 (25–37)
Physicians-in-training
Wearable activity monitor (linked with website) Fitbit activity monitor (Fitbit, USA) used with Fitbit website.
Gift card lottery for wearing device (phase 1) and highest steps (phase 2).
Workplace initiatives: access to fitness centres, personal training and nutritionists, weekly healthy lunch
Phase 1 – blinded activity monitor (no access to website).
Gift card lottery and workplace initiatives (as intervention group).
Phase 2 – no control or comparison group
PA Daily step count (phase 1 median and mean steps/day, phase 2 mean steps/day)
(OB – step data from Fitbit)
Proportion of days activity monitor was worn (i.e. compliance)
Weight
BMI
Waist circumference
Systolic and diastolic BP
Lipids (total, HDL and LDL cholesterol)
Use/engagement with the wider wellness programme (e.g. fitness centre, nutrition)
12 weeks
Torquati et al. 201866 Australia Two metropolitan hospitals in Brisbane (private and public) Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled pilot) n = 47
13% M, 87% F
Age 41.4±12.1
Nurses and nursing managers
Smartphone app Smartphone app for PA and diet with non-interactive pedometer and dedicated Facebook group No control or comparison group PA + SB Time spent sedentary and in light activity and MVPA
Daily steps
(OB - ActiGraph™ GT-3x+ accelerometer)
Diet behaviour: Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ)
Weight
BMI
Waist circumference
Blood pressure
Self-rated health
PA and diet self-efficacy
Social support
Feasibility outcomes (including qualitative interviews): reach, adoption (use) and implementation
6 months
van Dantzig et al. 201354
Netherlands
Offices at various companies in Netherlands (no further detail given) Experiment 2 = RCT (experiment 1 was a small qualitative evaluation and impact on PA/SB not reported) n = 86
60% M, 40% F
Age
IG: 44.5±7.9
CG: 44.3±8.0
Sedentary office workers
Wearable activity monitor (linked with website, and persuasive text messages) Clip-on commercial activity monitor (tri-axial accelerometer, model not stated) linked with personal web page for viewing PA data.
Timely persuasive text messages on smartphones.
Activity monitor only.
No text messages.
SB Computer activity (minutes, proxy for SB)
Physical activity (minutes)
(OB – computer activity from computer software; PA from activity monitor)
Engagement with the intervention (proportion of text messages read) 6 weeks
Yeung et al. 201759 USA Academic hospital residency (Cincinnati, Ohio) Prospective cohort (pre- and post- uncontrolled crossover study) n = 86
38% M, 62% Fb
Ageb
62% 21–30
31% 31–40
5% 41–50
Internal medicine residents
Wearable activity monitor and smartphone app (or website) Wrist-worn Fitbit Flex (Fitbit, USA) used with Fitbit app and/or website for monitoring steps (weeks 1–4 blinded, weeks 5–8 unblinded). Optional in-app activity tracking group for weeks 5–8. No control or comparison group PA Daily steps (comparison of blinded vs. unblinded periods)
(OB – step data from Fitbit)
Proportion of participants achieving ≥10,000 steps/day 8 weeks

M: male; F: female; IG: intervention group; CG: control/comparison group; FTE: full time equivalent; PA: physical activity; SB: sedentary behaviour; OB: objective; SR: self-reported; QoL: quality of life; RCT: randomised controlled trial; ± or SD: standard deviation; MVPA: moderate to vigorous physical activity; BP: blood pressure; BMI: body mass index; MET: metabolic equivalent; IPAQ: international physical activity questionnaire; QQ: Quantity and Quality questionnaire; IQR: Interquartile Range; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; AQuAA: Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents and Adults; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

aTools may be referred to as activity monitors or trackers in the literature; the term ‘monitor’ is used here for consistency.

bYeung et al. and Olsen et al. report gender and age of study completers only.