Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;62(1):146–152. doi: 10.33160/yam.2019.03.020

Table 1.

PET parameters of patients with thymic epithelial tumors according the WHO classification and Masaoka staging system

No. of patients SUVmax MTV TLG
Mean ± SD (range) Mean ± SD (range) Mean ± SD (range)
WHO classification
Low-risk thymoma (A-B1) 17 2.9 ± 0.8 (1.2–4.1) 7.0 ± 11.9 (0–46.8) 20.3 ± 35.9 (0–142.3)
Type A 1 4.6 5.0 16.5
Type AB 9 3.0 ± 0.6 (2.4–4.1) 10.5 ± 15.7 (0–46.8) 30.7 ± 47.5 (0–142.3)
Type B1 7 2.7 ± 0.7 (1.2–3.3) 2.8 ± 3.4 (0–8.6) 7.6 ± 9.2 (0–24.3)
High-risk thymoma (B2-B3) 8 3.8 ± 1.9 (1.8–7.5) 28.7 ± 37.7 (0–91.0) 110.8 ± 158.8 (0–382.6)
Type B2 4 4.6 ± 2.5 (2.0–7.5) 52.0 ± 43.9 (0–91.0) 205.6 ± 186.1 (0–382.6)
Type B3 4 3.0 ± 0.9 (1.8–3.8) 5.4 ± 5.2 (0–10.8) 16.0 ± 15.9 (0–33.0)
Carcinoma 7 5.0 ± 1.4 (3.7–8.0) 73.0 ± 145.5 (2.7–396.5) 229.5 ± 434.8 (9.5–1181.6)
Masaoka staging system
Early stage (I-II) 24 3.2 ± 1.1 (1.2–5.6) 9.7 ± 20.1 (0–91.0) 31.6 ± 73.0 (0–342.2)
Stage I 13 2.6 ± 0.7 (1.2–3.6) 4.3 ± 7.1 (0–25.0) 12.1 ± 20.2 (0–71.0)
Stage II 11 3.8 ± 1.1 (2.5–5.6) 15.9 ± 28.1 (0.1–91.0) 54.6 ± 103.4 (0.3–342.2)
Advanced stage (III-IV) 8 4.8 ± 1.9 (2.7–8.0) 78.6 ± 132.6 (2.7–396.5) 260.6 ± 399.6 (9.5–1181.6)
Stage III 8 4.8 ± 1.9 (2.7–8.0) 78.6 ± 132.6 (2.7–396.5) 260.6 ± 399.6 (9.5–1181.6)

All values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. MTV, metabolic tumor volume; PET, positron emission tomography; SD, standard deviation; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; TLG, total lesion glycolytic activity; VOI, volume of interest; WHO, World Health Organization.