TABLE 1.
Subspecies and drug | MIC (mg/liter) |
Susceptibility breakpoint (mg/liter)b |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50% | 90% | Range | Susceptible | Intermediate | Resistant | |
M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (n = 13)c | ||||||
Rifabutin | 16 | 32 | 8 to 32 | ≤2 (0, 0) | >2 (13, 100.0) | |
Clarithromycin | 4 | 8 | 0.5 to 16 | ≤2 (5, 38.5) | 4 (2, 15.4) | ≥8 (6, 46.2) |
Amikacin | 32 | 32 | 16 to 64 | ≤16 (2, 15.4) | 32 (10, 76.9) | ≥64 (1, 7.7) |
Cefoxitin | 32 | 32 | 16 to 64 | ≤16 (1, 7.7) | 32–64 (12, 92.3) | ≥128 (0, 0) |
Ceftibuten | 256 | 256 | 128 to 256 | ≤16 (0, 0) | 32–64 (0, 0) | ≥128 (13, 100.0) |
Clofazimine | 1 | 2 | 0.5 to 2 | ≤2 (13, 100.0) | ≥8 (0, 0) | |
Doxycycline | >64 | >64 | >64 | ≤1 (0, 0) | 2-4 (0, 0) | ≥8 (13, 100.0) |
Imipenem | 16 | 16 | 8 to 64 | ≤4 (0, 0) | 8–16 (11, 84.6) | ≥32 (2, 15.4) |
Linezolid | 32 | 32 | 4 to 64 | ≤8 (1, 7.7) | 16 (0, 0) | ≥32 (12, 92.3) |
Moxifloxacin | 32 | 32 | 8 to 256 | ≤1 (0, 0) | 2 (0, 0) | ≥4 (13, 100) |
Tigecycline | 0.5 | 1 | 0.25 to 1 | ≤0.5 (10, 76.9) | 1 (3, 23.1) | ≥2 (0, 0) |
M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (n = 13)d | ||||||
Rifabutin | 16 | 16 | 2 to 16 | ≤2 (1, 7.7) | >2 (12, 92.3) | |
Clarithromycin | 0.25 | 2 | <0.03 to >256 | ≤2 (11, 84.6) | 4 (0, 0) | ≥8 (2, 15.4) |
Amikacin | 32 | 32 | 8 to 64 | ≤16 (3, 23.1) | 32 (9, 69.2) | ≥64 (1, 7.7) |
Cefoxitin | 32 | 64 | 16 to 128 | ≤16 (2, 15.4) | 32-64 (10, 76.9) | ≥128 (1, 7.7) |
Ceftibuten | 256 | 256 | 128 to 256 | ≤16 (0, 0) | 32-64 (0, 0) | ≥128 (13, 100.0) |
Clofazimine | 2 | 2 | 0.5 to 2 | ≤2 (13, 100.0) | ≥8 (0, 0) | |
Doxycycline | >64 | >64 | 8 to >64 | ≤1 (0, 0) | 2-4 (0, 0) | ≥8 (13, 100.0) |
Imipenem | 16 | 16 | 8 to 64 | ≤4 (0, 0) | 8–16 (11, 84.6) | ≥32 (2, 15.4) |
Linezolid | 32 | 32 | 1 to 32 | ≤8 (2, 15.4) | 16 (4, 30.8) | ≥32 (7, 53.8) |
Moxifloxacin | 32 | 32 | 2 to 128 | ≤1 (0, 0) | 2 (1, 7.7) | ≥4 (12, 92.3) |
Tigecycline | 0.5 | 1 | 0.06 to 1 | ≤0.5 (10, 76.9) | 1 (3, 23.1) | ≥2 (0, 0) |
The results of broth microdilution susceptibility testing are for each antimicrobial tested alone.
Data in parentheses represent the number, percent, of isolates with the indicated result. Data in bold indicate the MIC breakpoints applied in this study.
There were T28 (n = 10) and C28 (n = 3) sequevars among the 13 isolates. None of the isolates had rrl mutations.
A truncated erm41 (n = 12), the C28 sequevar (n = 1), and rrl mutations (A2057G, A2058G; n = 2) were found among the 13 isolates.