Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 27;63(4):e02234-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02234-18

TABLE 1.

MICs of 11 antimicrobials tested individually against Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus and Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense isolatesa

Subspecies and drug MIC (mg/liter)
Susceptibility breakpoint (mg/liter)b
50% 90% Range Susceptible Intermediate Resistant
M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (n = 13)c
    Rifabutin 16 32 8 to 32 ≤2 (0, 0) >2 (13, 100.0)
    Clarithromycin 4 8 0.5 to 16 ≤2 (5, 38.5) 4 (2, 15.4) ≥8 (6, 46.2)
    Amikacin 32 32 16 to 64 ≤16 (2, 15.4) 32 (10, 76.9) ≥64 (1, 7.7)
    Cefoxitin 32 32 16 to 64 ≤16 (1, 7.7) 32–64 (12, 92.3) ≥128 (0, 0)
    Ceftibuten 256 256 128 to 256 ≤16 (0, 0) 32–64 (0, 0) ≥128 (13, 100.0)
    Clofazimine 1 2 0.5 to 2 ≤2 (13, 100.0) ≥8 (0, 0)
    Doxycycline >64 >64 >64 ≤1 (0, 0) 2-4 (0, 0) ≥8 (13, 100.0)
    Imipenem 16 16 8 to 64 ≤4 (0, 0) 8–16 (11, 84.6) ≥32 (2, 15.4)
    Linezolid 32 32 4 to 64 ≤8 (1, 7.7) 16 (0, 0) ≥32 (12, 92.3)
    Moxifloxacin 32 32 8 to 256 ≤1 (0, 0) 2 (0, 0) ≥4 (13, 100)
    Tigecycline 0.5 1 0.25 to 1 ≤0.5 (10, 76.9) 1 (3, 23.1) ≥2 (0, 0)
M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (n = 13)d
    Rifabutin 16 16 2 to 16 ≤2 (1, 7.7) >2 (12, 92.3)
    Clarithromycin 0.25 2 <0.03 to >256 ≤2 (11, 84.6) 4 (0, 0) ≥8 (2, 15.4)
    Amikacin 32 32 8 to 64 ≤16 (3, 23.1) 32 (9, 69.2) ≥64 (1, 7.7)
    Cefoxitin 32 64 16 to 128 ≤16 (2, 15.4) 32-64 (10, 76.9) ≥128 (1, 7.7)
    Ceftibuten 256 256 128 to 256 ≤16 (0, 0) 32-64 (0, 0) ≥128 (13, 100.0)
    Clofazimine 2 2 0.5 to 2 ≤2 (13, 100.0) ≥8 (0, 0)
    Doxycycline >64 >64 8 to >64 ≤1 (0, 0) 2-4 (0, 0) ≥8 (13, 100.0)
    Imipenem 16 16 8 to 64 ≤4 (0, 0) 8–16 (11, 84.6) ≥32 (2, 15.4)
    Linezolid 32 32 1 to 32 ≤8 (2, 15.4) 16 (4, 30.8) ≥32 (7, 53.8)
    Moxifloxacin 32 32 2 to 128 ≤1 (0, 0) 2 (1, 7.7) ≥4 (12, 92.3)
    Tigecycline 0.5 1 0.06 to 1 ≤0.5 (10, 76.9) 1 (3, 23.1) ≥2 (0, 0)
a

The results of broth microdilution susceptibility testing are for each antimicrobial tested alone.

b

Data in parentheses represent the number, percent, of isolates with the indicated result. Data in bold indicate the MIC breakpoints applied in this study.

c

There were T28 (n = 10) and C28 (n = 3) sequevars among the 13 isolates. None of the isolates had rrl mutations.

d

A truncated erm41 (n = 12), the C28 sequevar (n = 1), and rrl mutations (A2057G, A2058G; n = 2) were found among the 13 isolates.