Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;53(3):1800986. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00986-2018

TABLE 2.

Predictive performance of various methods in the primary and validation cohorts

AUC (95% CI) Accuracy % (95% CI) Sensitivity % (95% CI) Specificity % (95% CI)
Clinical model
 Primary 0.66 (0.62–0.70) 61.60 (57.90–65.15) 64.39 (59.75–68.90) 56.75 (50.65–62.68)
 Validation 0.61 (0.58–0.64) 61.83 (58.88–64.88) 56.30 (52.41–60.41) 67.21 (63.20–71.20)
Semantic model
 Primary 0.76 (0.72–0.80) 64.77 (61.31–68.22) 71.49 (67.86–75.09) 61.22 (57.45–65.12)
 Validation 0.64 (0.61–0.67) 62.24 (59.94–64.72) 63.03 (59.61–66.60) 61.48 (58.22–64.92)
Radiomics model
 Primary 0.70 (0.66–0.74) 66.27 (62.96–69.83) 85.05 (81.81–88.46) 40.98 (35.82–46.34)
 Validation 0.64 (0.61–0.67) 61.47 (58.69–64.69) 64.04 (60.34–68.34) 58.97 (55.10–63.10)
DL model
 Primary 0.85 (0.83–0.88) 77.02 (74.02–79.97) 76.83 (73.17–80.49) 79.03 (74.26–83.61)
 Validation 0.81 (0.79–0.83) 73.86 (71.82–75.82) 72.27 (69.27–75.27) 75.41 (72.32–78.32)

Data are presented as % (95% CI). All the results in the primary cohort were evaluated by five-fold cross-validation. Bold type represents the best performance. AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.