Table 6.
Correlations between response threshold adaptation and language test performance.
| Test | r | p value |
|---|---|---|
| CCT | .66 | .02* |
| PNT (Short Form) | .37 | .21 |
| PALPA subtests | ||
| • 24. Written lexical decision: illegal nonwords | .22 | .36 |
| • 25. Written lexical decision: imageability/frequency | .33 | .21 |
| • 48. Written word–picture matching | −.35 | .21 |
| CLQT composite scores | ||
| • Attention | .38 | .21 |
| • Memory | .44 | .21 |
| • Executive function | .31 | .24 |
| • Language | .41 | .21 |
| • Visuospatial | .28 | .26 |
Note. * indicates p < .05, adjusting for multiple comparisons by correcting for false discovery rate (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995). CCT = Cactus and Camel Test; PNT = Philadelphia Naming Test (Version A); PALPA = Psycholinguistic Assessment of Linguistic Performance in Aphasia; CLQT = Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test.