Table 2.
Performance measurement based on overlapping areas between the proposed approach and other segmentation approaches on the DIARETDB0 database and DRISHTI-GS database.
| Average overlapping ratio (DIARETDB0) (%) | Accuracy rate (DIARETDB0) (%) | Average overlapping ratio (DRISHTI-GS) (%) | Accuracy rate (DRISHTI-GS) (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hough [31] | 61.42 | 89.60 | 60.55 | 88.10 |
| MRS [35] | 61.96 | 90.80 | 60.81 | 88.60 |
| GVF [36] | 63.66 | 92.80 | 61.86 | 91.30 |
| CV [37] | 55.15 | 86.10 | 55.15 | 85.30 |
| LIF [28] | 63.89 | 93.10 | 63.02 | 91.70 |
| LSACM [38] | 64.24 | 93.90 | 63.91 | 93.50 |
| Ours (LIFO) | 66.59 | 96.30 | 65.61 | 96.10 |
| Normal | 67.33 | 98.40 | 66.25 | 98.90 |
| Abnormal | 65.53 | 95.90 | 64.87 | 94.90 |