Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan-Mar;11(1):17–22. doi: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_98_18

Table 3.

Comparison of resistance pattern among biofilm and nonbiofilm producers

Antibiotics Biofilm producers (n=69), n (%) Nonbiofilm producers (n=31), n (%)

Sensitive Resistant Sensitive Resistant
Ampicillin 6 (8.7) 63 (91.3) 4 (12.9) 27 (87.1)
Co-trimoxazole 18 (26.1) 51 (73.9) 19 (61.3) 12 (38.7)
Norfloxacin 4 (5.8) 65 (94.2) 6 (19.4) 25 (80.6)
Ciprofloxacin 4 (5.8) 65 (94.2) 8 (25.8) 23 (74.2)
Gentamicin 4 (5.8) 65 (94.2) 19 (61.3) 12 (38.7)
Nalidixic acid 5 (8.3) 64 (92.7) 8 (25.8) 23 (74.2)
Amoxyclav 1 (1.4) 68 (98.6) 4 (12.9) 27 (87.1)
Amikacin 35 (50.7) 34 (49.3) 19 (61.3) 12 (38.7)
Cephalexin 1 (1.4) 68 (98.6) 6 (19.4) 25 (80.6)
Cefoperozone with sulbactam 17 (24.6) 52 (75.4) 11 (35.5) 20 (64.5)
Piperacillin/tazobactam 40 (58) 29 (42) 19 (61.3) 12 (38.7)
Ofloxacin 7 (10.1) 62 (89.9) 6 (19.4) 25 (80.6)
Imipenem 61 (88.4) 8 (11.6) 30 (96.8) 1 (3.2)
Nitrofurantoin 52 (75.4) 17 (24.6) 26 (83.9) 5 (16.1)
Ceftazidime/clavulanic acid 15 (21.7) 54 (78.3) 07 (23.6) 24 (77.4)

χ2=16.79, P=0.01 (co-trimoxazole, norfloxacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, cephalexin, imipenem, amoxyclav), χ2=2.036, P=0.92 (ampicillin, amikacin, cefoperozone with sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, ceftazidime/clavulanic acid)