Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;19:276. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5487-6

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival rate at 12 months (OS-12 m) and grade 3–4 adverse effects (grade 3–4 AEs) of B + E in patients with advanced HCC

ORR OS-12 m
Group N ES (95% CI) P Values I2 (%) N ES (95% CI) P Values I2 (%)
Total 342 0.126 (0.063,0.190) 70.0% 298 0.437 (0.329,0.546) 72.6%
ECOG
 0–1 176 0.117 (0.009,0.224) 0.956 77.6% 176 0.376(.121,0.631) 0.701 85.1%
 0–2 166 0.140 (0.044,0.236) 73.3% 122 0.470 (0.351,0.589) 63.9%
Pre-schedule
 Prior systematic therapy 180 0.145 (0.044,0.247) 0.128 77.3% 136 0.443 (0.243, 0.644) o.456 83.5%
 No systematic therapy 162 0.103 (0.015,0.191) 67.9% 162 0.408 (0.332, 0.483) 0.0%
Line of treatment
 First line 162 0.103 (0.015,0.191) 0.089 68.9% 162 0.408 (0.332, 0.483) 0.048 0.0%
 Second line 180 0.145 (0.044,0.247) 77.3% 37 0.267(−0.007,0.542) 83.5%
Region
 America 237 0.161 (0.068,0.258) 0.014 76.7% 237 0.481 (0.369,0.592) 0.517 65.2%
 Not America 105 0.071 (0.020,0.123) 0.0% 61 0.308(−0.036,0.652) 87.2%
Liver functions
 Child-Pugh class A/B 147 0.170 (0.019,0.321) 0.224 84.2% 147 0.524 (0.418,0.630) < 0.001 40.5%
 Child-Pugh class A 195 0.098 (0.044,0.153) 38.4% 151 0.341 (0.179,0.503) 74.4%

Note: Liver functions: the subgroup of Child-Pugh class A and B refers patients enrolled with liver function of Child-Pugh class B excess 10%, otherwise the subgroup of Child-Pugh class A. ES Effect size, ORR objective response rate, OS overall survival, AEs adverse effects, B + E bevacizumab combined with erlotinib