Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;17:69. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1303-z

Table 5.

Determinants of treatment rates by community medicine distributors

Variablea Coef. Clustered robust SE p value 95% confidence interval
In-group biasb 0.139 0.059 0.025 0.019 0.259
Selected by local councilc − 0.085 0.053 0.121 − 0.194 0.024
Friends help with MDAd 0.084 0.040 0.041 0.004 0.165
Female − 0.120 0.057 0.043 − 0.235 − 0.004
Fisherman/fishmongere 0.149 0.040 0.001 0.067 0.232
Household uses protected drinking water source 0.134 0.040 0.002 0.053 0.216
Network betweennessf 0.030 0.008 0.001 0.013 0.047
Constant 0.095 0.050 0.067 − 0.007 0.197

Obs. 59, R2 = 0.331, F-stat. 13.69, F-stat. p value < 0.0001. Root mean squared error (RMSE) from 8-fold cross-validation = 0.183. Variables selected through Lasso with 8-fold cross-validation. Mean squared error (MSE) of Lasso cross-validation = 0.076

aThe results shown are from an ordinary least squares regression with standard errors clustered by the village

bIn-group bias is positive if the CMD was altruistic towards their friends and not altruistic towards strangers

cThe base category includes CMD selection by community meeting or direct nomination from a village health team member

dMDA = mass drug administration

eThe base category for these occupations includes all other CMD occupations

fNetwork betweenness was not significant (p value > 0.05) when one outlier was removed (Additional file 1: Table S4) 58/59 CMDs had network betweenness ≤ 3 whilst 1/59 CMDs had network betweenness = 11.58