Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0213926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213926

Table 1. Summary of samples used in the survey.

Disease state/
Sample ID
Collection place, near Group ID Read archives/
columns in the dataset
Illumina technology (6 in total):
Healthy before disease Bolshie Koty village (southern basin) Sp2010healthy primers 357, 515
Healthy in appearance Hoboy Cape (central basin) Sp2011green primers 357, 515
Diseased Hoboy Cape (central basin) Sp2011pink primers 357, 515 (*)
454 GS technology (23 in total, collected in 2015 year):
Sponges healthy in appearance:
L1,L2,L3,L7,L8 Lystvyanka (southern basin) Sp2015green replicates 1–5
OV1,OV3,OV4,OV6 Olkhonskiye Vorota (central basin) replicates 1–4
T1,T4,T6 Turali Cape (northern basin) replicates 1–3
Diseased sponges:
L4,L5,L6 Lystvyanka (southern basin) Sp2015diseased replicates 1–3
OV2,OV5,OV7,OV8 Olkhonskiye Vorota (central basin) replicates 1–4
T2,T3,T5,T7 Turali Cape (northern) replicates 1–4

(*) the similar sample of Sp2011pink/454 was processed and sequenced using the 454 GS technology [69] and included into representations of the dataset in S1 Text.