Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;10:631. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00631

Table 1.

Neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological evaluation synopsis.

Max score YW’s scores Cut-off
MMSE 30 30 ≥23.8
Attentional matrices 60 52 ≥31
TMT A 500 38 ≤94
TMT B 500 64 ≤283
TMT B-A 26 ≤187
Bell test 35 35 ≥32
Verbal fluency_ semantic 22.25 ≥7.25
Verbal fluency_ phonetic 36 ≥17.35
Wechsler memory_4 22 10 /
Wechsler memory_7 2, 5 19,5 /
TOM_1 4 4 ≥3
TOM_2 4 4 ≥3
RME 36 21 ≥21
TIB_IQ TOT 112.15 90–110
TIB_IQ verbal 109.23 90–110
TIB_IQ performance 103.75 90–110
WAIS-R IQ_TOT 108 90–109
Bads total score 24 13 ≥13
WCST % 100 75 ≥37.1
WCST_errors % 100 25 /
WCST_pers errors % 100 31.25 ≤42.7
Confidence 100 68.28 /
Accuracy 100 60 /
Free choice improvement 0.0125 /
Global monitoring -0.7375 /
Monitoring resolution -12 /
Control sensitivity 0.4375 /
Monetary gain 5.2 /
BPRS 168 30 /
YMRS 60 5 ≤12
HDR-S 67 6 ≤7
AES-C 72 56 ≥37.5
SRSI 60 15 /
TAS-20 100 43 ≤51

Wherever there is a maximum score and/or a normative value, the cut-off scores are given in the statistical normal direction; the values refer to the normative data for healthy controls matched for age and education. Empty cell in the last column indicate the absence of a normative cut-off for that assessment tool; where there is no a normative cut-off, clinical practice and scale direction have been used to evaluate the subject’s performance. No abnormal value was detected by the neuropsychological assessment.