Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;7:78. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00078

Table 2.

Bivariate correlations in the overall sample and by gender.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ALL
1 Gender (Male) 1 0.08# 0.13** 0.05 −0.06 0.05 0.06 −0.04 0.22**
2 Age (Year) (Wave 1) 1 −0.11** −0.10* 0.09* 0.08* −0.06 0.10* −0.03
3 SES Marital status (Wave 1) 1 0.15** −0.10* −0.01 0.05 −0.16** −0.05
4 SES Two parents working (Wave 1) 1 −0.07# −0.01 −0.03 −0.05 −0.03
5 Substance use by parents (Wave 1) 1 0.21** 0.06 0.23** 0.22**
6 Substance use by friends (Wave 1) 1 0.14** 0.32** 0.18**
7 PRD (Wave 5) 1 0.03 0.08
8 MU (Wave 2) 1 0.23**
9 MU Average (Waves 6–12) 1
MALES/FEMALES
1 Gender (Male) -
2 Age (Year) (Wave 1) 1 −0.16** −0.10# 0.16** 0.16** −0.11 0.11# −0.03
3 SES Marital status (Wave 1) −0.08 1 0.14* −0.09 0.03 0.14# −0.15* −0.09
4 SES Two parents working (Wave 1) −0.10# 0.14* 1 −0.06 −0.13* 0.00 −0.04 −0.08
5 Substance use by parents (Wave 1) 0.04 −0.10# −0.08 1 0.23** 0.14 0.20** 0.28**
6 Substance use by friends (Wave 1) 0.01 −0.05 0.09 0.21** 1 0.14 0.31** 0.22**
7 PRD (Wave 5) −0.03 −0.03 −0.05 0.02 0.11# 1 −0.01 0.18*
8 MU (Wave 2) 0.10 −0.17** −0.05 0.26** 0.34** 0.05 1 0.31**
9 MU Average (Waves 6–12) −0.07 −0.06 0.01 0.21** 0.12* −0.04 0.17** 1

Source: FAS, flint adolescent study (1994–2012), PRD, perceived racial discrimination; MU, marijuana use; SES, socioeconomic status; Males Upper Diagonal; Females Lower Diagonal,

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

#

p < 0.1.