Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 17;132(3):797–816. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3252-x

Table 1.

Comparison of pooled and whole genome sequencing-based trait mapping approaches

Description Pooled based Whole population based
Indel-Seq Seq-BSA QTL-seq MutMap BSR-seq WGRS GBS SKIM-seq SNP array RNA-seq
Cost Low Low Low Low Low High Medium Medium High Medium
Mapping 1–2 traits at a time Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes
Mapping > 2 traits at a time No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
DNA/RNA based DNA DNA DNA DNA RNA DNA DNA DNA DNA RNA
Variants InDels SNPs SNPs SNPs SNPs SNPs SNPs SNPs SNPs SNPs
Approach RG = HTP=HTB ≠ LTB HTP = HTB≠LTB and SNP index SNP index SNP frequency SNPs/FPKM SNP calls SNP calls SNP calls SNP variation FPKM
Status of sequencing-based trait mapping in legume crops + + +++ ++ +++ + +++

RG reference genome, HTP high trait parent, HTB high trait bulk, LTB low trait bulk, FPKM Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads

+, ++ and +++ signs indicate technologies utilized in moderate, good and excellent quantity in the legume crops, and – sign indicates technologies yet to be utilized in legume crops