Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 26;12(1):100009. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2018.11.007

Table 4.

Known groups validity of the UCT (CSU and CINDU).

N Mean SD Median Kruskal-Vallis Test p
PatGA-LS-1st CSU
 No complaints 16 15.13 2.062 16.00 47.178 <0.001
 Mild complaints 34 11.09 2.690 12.00
 Moderate complaints 25 8.04 2.336 8.00
 Severe complaints 6 4.33 3.204 3.50
PatGA-LS-1st CINDU
 No complaints 3 13.67 1.155 13.00 34.226 <0.001
 Mild complaints 20 11.25 2.826 12.00
 Moderate complaints 40 7.80 2.662 8.00
 Severe complaints 15 5.27 2.086 6.00
PHYGA-LS-1st CSU
 Complete control 19 14.16 2.651 15.00 43.629 <0.001
 Good control 34 11.24 2.742 12.00
 Moderate control 23 7.65 2.367 7.00
 Little control 2 7.00 1.414 7.00
 No control 3 1.67 0.577 2.00
PHY-LS-1st CINDU
 Complete control 1 16.00 16.00 49.100 <0.001
 Good control 18 12.78 1.396 12.50
 Moderate control 36 7.89 1.997 8.00
 Little control 20 5.85 2.277 6
 No control 3 3.33 2.082 4
UAS28-1st-R
 <6 14 14.79 2.517 16.00 34.281 0.000
 7-24 23 11.39 3.394 12.00
 25-64 19 9.63 3.804 10.00
 >65 25 7.76 2.454 8.00
PAT-ATR-1st CSU
 Treatment sufficient 53 12.19 3.051 12.00 196.000 0.000
 Treatment not sufficient 28 7.14 3.147 7.00
PAT-ATR-1st CINDU
 Treatment not sufficient 49 6.53 2.399 6.00 87.500 0.000
 Treatment sufficient 29 11.62 2.321 12.00
PHY-ATR-1st CSU
 Treatment sufficient 52 12.31 3.052 12.00 170.000 0.000
 Treatment not sufficient 29 7.10 2.920 7.00
PHY-ATR-1st CINDU
 Treatment not sufficient 59 6.92 2.336 7.00 49.555 0.000
 Treatment sufficient 19 13.11 1.329 13.00

Kruskal-Vallis.