Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;7:82. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00082

Table 5.

Raw and percent differences in metabolic equivalents between individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and matched sedentary individuals during serial cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), based on re-analysis of data from Snell et al. (26).

ME/CFS (n = 51) Control (n = 10)
CPET1
VO2, Peak 21.51 (4.09)
20.34–22.71
25.04 (4.41)
22.35–27.73
METs, Peak (Calculated) 6.15 (1.17)
5.81–6.49
7.15 (1.26)
6.39–7.92
% Difference, Peak −16.3%
VO2, VAT 12.74 (2.85)
11.92–13.55
13.83 (2.79)
12.00–15.67
METs, VAT (Calculated) 3.64 (0.81)
3.41–3.87
3.95 (0.78)
3.43–4.48
% Difference, Peak −8.2%
CPET2
VO2, Peak 20.44 (4.47)
19.25–21.63
23.96 (4.30)
21.27–26.65
METs, Peak (Calculated) 5.84 (1.28)
5.50–6.18
6.85 (1.23)
6.08–7.61
% Difference, Peak −14.7%
VO2, VAT 11.36 (2.91)
10.39–12.01
14.12 (3.26)
12.29–15.96
METs, VAT (Calculated) 3.25 (0.83)
2.97–3.43
4.03 (.93)
3.51–4.56
% Difference, VAT −19.4%

Decremented performance was noted in individuals with ME/CFS on the second CPET at peak exertion and ventilatory anaerobic threshold, indicating the physiological correlates of post-exertional malaise. Measurements are expressed as mean (standard deviation) and 95% confidence interval. CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise test; HR, heart rate; ME/CFS, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; METs, metabolic equivalents; VAT, ventilatory anaerobic threshold.