Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 27;4(3):237–245. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0084

Table 3. Factors Associated With Mortality After Septal Myectomya.

Variable Comparisonb Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI)c P Value
Age, y 65.6:44.5 3.09 (2.12-4.52) <.001
Year of surgery 2013:2004 0.82 (0.55-1.22) .001
BMI 34:26 1.22 (0.90-1.66) .001
Diabetes mellitus Yes:no 1.57 (1.10-2.24) .01
New York Heart Association class IV:I 2.31 (1.03-5.15) .04
Amiodarone Yes:no 1.59 (1.00-2.54) .05
Pacemaker Yes:no 1.38 (0.98-1.95) .07
Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia Yes:no 0.70 (0.42-1.18) .18
Hypertension Yes:no 1.20 (0.91-1.57) .19
Disopyramide Yes:no 0.79 (0.52-1.18) .25
Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers Yes:no 0.83 (0.59-1.17) .29
Presyncope Yes:no 1.12 (0.88-1.44) .35
Dyslipidemia Yes:no 1.12 (0.86-1.46) .41
Prior septal reduction Yes:no 1.27 (0.71-2.27) .42
Syncope Yes:no 1.11 (0.83-1.51) .48
Mitral valve regurgitation grade Moderate:mild 1.04 (0.93-1.16) .49
Race Nonwhite:white 0.68 (0.22-2.17) .69
Unknown:white 1.17 (0.66-2.10)
β-Blocker Yes:no 0.95 (0.71-1.27) .72
Calcium-channel blocker Yes:no 1.04 (0.81-1.34) .74
Family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Yes:no 0.94 (0.64-1.37) .75
Ethnicity Hispanic:non-Hispanic 1.17 (0.35-3.88) .80
Family history of sudden cardiac death Yes:no 1.06 (0.68-1.65) .81
Anteroseptal wall thickness, mm 23:17 1.06 (0.80-1.40) .84
Sex Female:male 0.98 (0.76-1.26) .86
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator Yes:no 1.01 (0.56-1.81) .97

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared).

a

A multivariable Cox regression model was fitted for all-cause mortality on 2328 participants using the variables shown; we further adjusted for 2 nonmodeled variables (atrial fibrillation and left ventricular ejection fraction) by stratifying the model on levels of each (with left ventricular ejection fraction grouped into quartiles), owing to failure of the proportional hazards assumption.

b

Continuous variables were expanded into multiple terms using restricted cubic splines (using 4 knots) to allow for nonlinear effects. Owing to data discreteness, a linear association was assumed for ordinal scales of New York Heart Association and mitral regurgitation grade. The reference value is the righthand value in each pair.

c

Effects of variables are estimated with adjusted hazard ratios (and 95% CIs). For continuous variables, hazard ratios were calculated comparing the 75th percentile with the 25th percentile. Since these variables are modeled nonlinearly, general tests of association can easily generate a significant P value, even when the confidence interval of a hazard ratio contains 1.0.