Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):609–611. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20404

Table. Performance Measures of Opioid Overutilization Criteria for Classifying Medicare Beneficiaries With Opioid Use Disorder or Overdose, 2011-2014.

6-Month Cycles by Study Year Eligible Sample, No.a Patients Meeting CMS Criteria for Opioid Overutilizers, No. (%)b,c Patients With OUD or Overdose Diagnosis at 18-mo Follow-up, No. (%)c,d No. of Patients Followed Up Performance Measures of CMS Criteria, % (95% CI)e,f
Diagnosis of OUD or Overdose No Diagnosis of OUD or Overdose
Yes No Yes No Met CMS Criteria Did Not Meet CMS Criteria Met CMS Criteria Did Not Meet CMS Criteria Sensitivity Specificity Positive Predictive Value
2011
January 1–June 30 142 036 739 (0.52) 141 297 5559 (3.91) 136 477 276 5283 463 136 014 4.96 (4.42-5.58) 99.66 (99.63-99.69) 37.35 (33.87-40.96)
April 1–September 30 162 841 929 (0.57) 161 912 7055(4.33) 155 786 327 6728 602 155 184 4.64 (4.16-5.16) 99.61 (99.58-99.64) 35.20 (32.14-38.38)
July 1–December 31 163 809 944 (0.58) 162 865 7460 (4.55) 156 349 350 7110 594 155 755 4.69 (4.23-5.20) 99.62 (99.59-99.65) 37.08 (34.00-40.26)
2012
January 1–June 30 166 522 641 (0.38) 165 881 8180 (4.91) 158 342 262 7918 379 157 963 3.20 (2.84-3.61) 99.76 (99.74-99.78) 40.87 (37.06-44.80)
April 1–September 30 166 920 646 (0.39) 166 274 8477 (5.08) 158 443 256 8221 390 158 053 3.02 (2.67-3.41) 99.75 (99.73-99.78) 39.63 (35.85-43.53)
July 1–December 31 167 288 612 (0.37) 166 676 8718 (5.21) 158 570 236 8482 376 158 194 2.71 (2.38-3.08) 99.76 (99.74-99.79) 38.56 (34.71-42.56)
2013
January 1–June 30 190 320 787 (0.41) 189 533 9911 (5.21) 180 409 323 9588 464 179 945 3.26 (2.92-3.63) 99.74 (99.72-99.77) 41.04 (37.59-44.58)
April 1–September 30 189 752 795 (0.42) 188 957 10 310 (5.43) 179 442 313 9997 482 178 960 3.04 (2.72-3.39) 99.73 (99.71-99.75) 39.37 (35.97-42.87)
July 1–December 31 189 103 735 (0.39) 188 368 10 663 (5.64) 178 440 332 10 331 403 178 037 3.11 (2.80-3.47) 99.77 (99.75-99.80) 45.17 (41.54-48.85)
2014
January 1–June 30 174 415 637 (0.37) 173 778 11 113 (6.37) 163 302 285 10 828 352 162 950 2.56 (2.28-2.88) 99.78 (99.76-99.81) 44.74 (40.85-48.70)
April 1–September 30 174 676 650 (0.37) 174 026 11 527 (6.60) 163 149 294 11 233 356 162 793 2.55 (2.27-2.86) 99.78 (99.76-99.80) 45.23 (41.37-49.15)
July 1–December 31 171 917 642 (0.37) 171 275 12 972 (7.55) 158 945 327 12 645 315 158 630 2.52 (2.26-2.81) 99.80 (99.78-99.82) 50.94 (47.00-54.86)

Abbreviations: CMS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; OUD, opioid use disorder.

a

In each cycle, the eligible sample was required to have continuous enrollment for 18 months, with the first 6 months devoted to the assessment of CMS criteria and the entire 18 months to determine the diagnosis of OUD or overdose diagnosis.

b

The CMS defined opioid overutilizers as receiving prescription opioids with a mean daily morphine equivalent dose ≥90 mg and from >3 clinician prescribers and >3 pharmacists or receiving a prescription of opioids with a mean daily morphine equivalent dose of ≥90 mg by >4 prescribers.

c

The denominator is the total eligible sample.

d

Opioid use disorder or overdose was defined as having at least 1 inpatient or outpatient encounter claim with one of the following International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes: 304.0x, 304.7x, 305.5x, 965.0x, E850.0-E850.2 or ICD-10-CM codes: F11.xx and T40.0X1, T40.0X4, T40.1X1, T40.1X4, T40.2X1, T40.2X4, T40.3X1, T40.3X4, T40.4X1, T40.4X4, T40.601, T40.604, T40.691, T40.694 in any diagnostic position of inpatient or outpatient encounter claims.

e

Sensitivity is calculated by dividing the number of patients who were diagnosed as having OUD or overdose and met CMS criteria by the total number of patients who were diagnosed as having OUD or overdose. Specificity is calculated by dividing the number of patients who were not diagnosed as having OUD or overdose and did not meet CMS criteria by the total number of patients who were not diagnosed as having OUD or overdose. The positive predictive value is calculated by dividing the number of patients who were diagnosed as having OUD or overdose and met CMS criteria by the total number of those who met CMS criteria.

f

Test for trend was examined using linear regression. Sensitivity was P<.001; specificity, P=.001; and positive predictive value, P <.001.