Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 22;179(3):435–437. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5976

Table 2. Questionnaire Responses Among 580 Study Participants Exposed to Different Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical Advertising Formats.

Questionnaire Item Mean (SD)
No Price (n = 116) Low Price High Price
Without Modifier(n = 115)a With Modifier (n = 116)b Without Modifier (n = 116)a With Modifier (n = 117)c
Ask your doctor about the drugd 5.12 (1.73) 5.29 (1.51) 5.33 (1.57) 2.90 (2.21)e 4.48 (1.95)e
Ask your insurer about the drugd 5.01 (1.82) 5.17 (1.75) 5.19 (1.80) 4.09 (2.27)f 4.85 (1.99)g
Research the drug onlined 5.94 (1.32) 6.12 (1.17) 6.12 (1.29) 4.92 (2.02)e 5.74 (1.47)f
Use the drugd 4.93 (1.52) 4.91 (1.43) 4.92 (1.49) 3.24 (2.05)e 4.36 (1.63)e
Expected out-of-pocket cost, $ 77.76 (148.94) 49.75 (43.62) 52.60 (77.97) 2787.08 (5209.57)e 1355.39 (3624.00)f
Perceived effectivenessh 5.14 (1.17) 5.10 (1.32) 5.23 (1.11) 5.29 (1.17) 5.14 (1.15)
a

Two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were conducted to determine whether the median value of the column is statistically different from the median value of the “No Price” column.

b

Two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were conducted to determine whether the median value of the column is statistically different from the median value of the “Low Price: Without Modifier” column.

c

Two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were conducted to determine whether the median value of the column is statistically different from the median value of the “High Price: Without Modifier” column.

d

Ranging from 1 (highly unlikely) to 7 (highly likely).5

e

P < .001.

f

P < .01.

g

P < .05.

h

Ranging from 1 (highly ineffective) to 7 (highly effective).5