Table 2.

Performances comparison with different negative samples selecting strategies (random strategy is denoted “random”, our strategy is “reliable”)

Methods	AUPR		AUC		PRE		REC		ACC		MCC		F1
	Random	Reliable	Random	Reliable	Random	Reliable	Random	Reliable	Random	Reliable	Random	Reliable	Random	Reliable
meta-path-1	0.894	0.896	0.859	0.861	0.786	0.771	0.875	0.891	0.835	0.835	0.673	0.677	0.827	0.826
meta-path-2	0.930	0.936	0.925	0.928	0.873	0.850	0.839	0.873	0.850	0.861	0.702	0.722	0.855	0.860
meta-path-3	0.921	0.926	0.902	0.905	0.826	0.832	0.862	0.883	0.843	0.858	0.690	0.719	0.842	0.855
meta-path-4	0.894	0.895	0.858	0.860	0.782	0.790	0.882	0.867	0.836	0.832	0.676	0.667	0.828	0.826
meta-path-5	0.918	0.920	0.892	0.895	0.809	0.800	0.900	0.925	0.859	0.865	0.721	0.737	0.852	0.858
ensemble	0.954	0.956	0.949	0.951	0.924	0.913	0.837	0.854	0.871	0.876	0.745	0.755	0.878	0.882