Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;18:74. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-1018-3

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of the association between rs2569190 (C-260T) polymorphism and CVD risk

Sub-group analysis No of data sets No of cases/controls Allele model (T VS.C) Dominant model (CC VS.TT + CT) Recessive model (TT VS.CC + CT)
Cases Controls OR (95% CI) POR PH OR (95% CI) POR PH OR (95% CI) POR PH
Overall 24 9413 7337 1.169(1.087–1.257) 2.44 × 10−5* 0.001 1.233(1.110–1.370) 3.79 × 10−5* 0.02 1.195(1.062–1.345) 0.003* 0.002
Ethnicity
 East Asian 7 1503 1597 1.370(1.226–1.531) 2.86 × 10−8* 0.308 1.574(1.278–1.938) 9.11 × 10−7* 0.217 1.492(1.236–1.801) 3.05 × 10−5* 0.22
 European 16 7403 5353 1.100(1.019–1.189) 0.015 0.047 1.113(1.006–1.232) 0.039 0.237 1.112(0.975–1.269) 0.113 0.04
 America 1 387 387 1.000(0.819–1.221) 1 1.142(0.830–1.571) 0.416 0.827(0.584–1.173) 0.287
Endpoint
 CHD 7 1019 1005 1.357(1.157–1.592) 2.47 × 10−7* 0.074 1.669(1.388–2.007) 2.48 × 10−6* 0.433 1.342(1.011–1.781) 0.042 0.035
 AMI 7 762 1244 1.152(1.036–1.281) 0.009 0.143 1.186(0.997–1.412) 0.054 0.131 1.162(1.030–1.310) 0.015 0.483
 MI 10 4641 3915 1.077(0.976–1.188) 0.139 0.072 1.061(0.949–1.186) 0.297 0.799 1.118(0.907–1.378) 0.297 0.002

OR odd ratio, 95%CI 95% confidence interval, PORP value for the test of association, PHP value for heterogeneity analysis

Significant P-value