Table 6. The evaluation metrics computed from best result of the BHCNet-3 in each magnification factor and compare the result to the previous work.
References | magnification | AUC (%) | MCC (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F-Measure (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nahid et al. [15] | 40× | 94.40 | - | 94.00 | 96.00 | 95.00 |
100× | 95.93 | - | 98.00 | 96.36 | 97.00 | |
200× | 97.19 | - | 98.00 | 98.20 | 98.00 | |
400× | 96.00 | - | 95.00 | 97.79 | 96.00 | |
Bardou et al. [4] | 40× | - | - | 97.80 | 97.57 | 97.68 |
100× | - | - | 98.58 | 96.98 | 97.77 | |
200× | - | - | 95.61 | 99.28 | 97.41 | |
400× | - | - | 97.54 | 96.49 | 97.07 | |
present work | 40× | 99.93 | 97.68 | 98.52 | 99.16 | 98.83 |
100× | 99.66 | 98.02 | 99.40 | 98.62 | 99.00 | |
200× | 99.96 | 98.57 | 99.44 | 99.13 | 99.28 | |
400× | 99.82 | 98.05 | 99.28 | 98.78 | 99.02 |