Table 8. The evaluation metrics computed from best result of the BHCNet-6 in each magnification factor and compare the result to the previous work.
References | magnification | AUC (%) | MCC (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F-Measure (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Han et al. [41] | 40× | 92.8 ± 2.1 | - | - | - | 92.9 |
100× | 93.9 ± 1.9 | - | - | - | 88.9 | |
200× | 93.7 ± 2.2 | - | - | - | 88.7 | |
400× | 92.9.8 ± 1.8 | - | - | - | 85.9 | |
Bardou et al. [4] | 40× | - | - | 84.27 | 83.79 | 83.74 |
100× | - | - | 84.29 | 84.48 | 84.31 | |
200× | - | - | 81.85 | 80.83 | 80.48 | |
400× | - | - | 80.84 | 81.03 | 80.63 | |
present work | 40× | 99.76 | 93.18 | 95.25 | 95.55 | 95.39 |
100× | 99.78 | 92.85 | 94.51 | 94.64 | 94.42 | |
200× | 99.51 | 90.29 | 90.71 | 92.24 | 91.42 | |
400× | 99.30 | 89.27 | 90.74 | 91.09 | 90.75 |