Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;57(4):e01727-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01727-18

TABLE 3.

Median regression analysis showing changes in the median LOS following the introduction of rapid PCR

Variable No. of patients Median LOS (h [95% CI]) Change in LOS within the intervention groups (pre to post)a
Adjusted DID analysisb
Unadjusted
Adjustedb
Coefficient (95% CI) P value Coefficient (95% CI) P value Coefficient (95% CI) P value
Intervention group
    Regardless of test results
        Standard PCR 953 100.9 (96.2 to 109.9) Reference group Reference group Reference group
        Rapid PCR 1,209 101.8 (97.1 to 112.8) 0.9 (−7.9 to 9.6) 0.85 −6.5 (−16.0 to 2.9) 0.18 −8.9 (−21.5 to 3.7) 0.17
    Positive test results
        Standard PCR 210 98.6 (94.5 to 116.9) Reference group Reference group Reference group
        Rapid PCR 440 92.9 (81.5 to 98.6) −5.5 (−19.9 to 8.8) 0.45 −21.2 (−38.0 to −4.5) 0.01 −21.5 (−36.8 to −6.2) <0.01
    Negative test results
        Standard PCR 743 101.4 (96.0 to 113.0) Reference group Reference group Reference group
        Rapid PCR 769 116.2 (103.4 to 122.6) 14.8 (2.4 to 27.1) 0.02 1.4 (−10.8 to 13.5) 0.83 −1.2 (−14.9 to 12.4) 0.86
Subgroup analysis including only patients whose test results were returned during their stay in the hospital
    Regardless of test results
        Standard PCR 773 126.0 (117.9 to 139.0) Reference group Reference group Reference group
        Rapid PCR 1,182 104.0 (98.3 to 114.8) −22.2 (−32.5 to −11.9) <0.01 −22.8 (−33.1 to −12.5) <0.01 −25.5 (−38.1 to −12.9) <0.01
    Positive test results
        Standard PCR 175 117.5 (100.5 to 142.8) Reference group Reference group Reference group
        Rapid PCR 437 93.2 (82.2 to 98.6) −24.3 (−42.0 to −6.6) <0.01 −27.9 (−45.2 to −10.5) <0.01 −33.4 (−49.5 to −17.3) <0.01
    Negative test results
        Standard PCR 598 129.7 (121.2 to 142.7) Reference group Reference group Reference group
        Rapid PCR 745 117.9 (109.6 to 125.2) −11.9 (−25.9 to 2.2) 0.09 −17.3 (−30.4 to −4.3) <0.01 −19.6 (−33.7 to −5.5) <0.01
Control group
    2016 937 75.3 (71.0 to 80.5) Reference group Reference group
    2017 1,102 78.9 (73.0 to 87.3) 3.2 (−5.6 to 12.1) 0.47 1.6 (−6.0 to 9.2) 0.68 Not applicable
a

A negative coefficient indicates a median decrease in the LOS compared to the reference group.

b

Adjusted for age, study hospital, the source of referral, intensive care admission status, mode of separation, Charlson comorbidity index and type of principal diagnosis. DID (difference-in-difference) = ΔLOS (h) in intervention group − ΔLOS (h) in control group.