Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;57(4):e01996-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01996-18

TABLE 3.

Rotating PIS analysis of sensitivity and specificity of NAATs for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urine and clinician-collected vaginal swab samples from womena

Comparison, sample type No. of samples tested No. of C. trachomatis PIS-positive samples tested/total no. % sensitivity (95% CI) P value for comparison with Cobas sensitivity No. of C. trachomatis PIS-negative samples tested/total no. % specificity (95% CI) P value for comparison with Cobas specificity
AC2 vs PIS (Cobas and CTQ/GCQ)
    Urine from women 3,839 254/272 93.4 (89.8–95.8) 0.348 3,555/3,567 99.7 (99.4–99.8) 0.838
    Vaginal swab (clinician) 3,836 266/270 98.5 (96.3–99.4) 1.000 3,531/3,566 99.0 (98.6–99.3) 0.882
CTQ/GCQ vs PIS (Cobas and AC2)
    Urine from women 3,852 243/285 85.3 (80.7–88.9) <0.001 3,560/3,567 99.8 (99.6–99.9) 0.480
    Vaginal swab (CC) 3,825 262/283 92.6 (88.9–95.1) 0.006 3,536/3,542 99.8 (99.6–99.9) <0.001
a

AC2, Hologic Aptima Combo 2 CT/NG assay; CC, clinician collected; Cobas, Cobas CT/NG test for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 systems; CTQ/GCQ, BD ProbeTec CT Qx and GC Qx amplified DNA assays; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; PIS, patient infected status.