Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;57(4):e01996-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01996-18

TABLE 6.

Rotating PIS analysis of sensitivity and specificity of NAATs for detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine and clinician-collected vaginal swab samples from womena

Comparison, sample type No. of samples tested No. of N. gonorrhoeae PIS-positive samples tested/total no. Sensitivity (95% CI) P value for comparison with Cobas sensitivity No. of N. gonorrhoeae PIS-negative samples tested/total no. Specificity (95% CI) P value for comparison with Cobas specificity
AC2 vs PIS (Cobas and CTQ/GCQ)
    Urine from women 3,853 49/59 83.1 (71.5–90.5) 0.012 3,778/3,794 99.6 (99.3–99.7) 0.002
    Vaginal swab (CC) 3,830 56/58 96.6 (88.3–99.0) 1.000 3,752/3,772 99.5 (99.2–99.7) 0.203
CTQ/GCQ vs PIS (Cobas and AC2)
    Urine from women 3,839 46/60 76.7 (64.6–85.6) 0.001 3,778/3,779 100 (99.9–100) 0.625
    Vaginal swab (CC) 3,839 56/60 93.3 (84.1–97.4) 0.302 3,777/3,779 99.9 (99.8–100) 0.046
a

AC2, Hologic APTIMA Combo 2 CT/NG Assay; CC, clinician collected; Cobas, Cobas CT/NG test for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 systems; CTQ/GCQ, BD ProbeTec CT Qx and GC Qx amplified DNA assays; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; PIS, patient infected status.