Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul 31;211(4):812–821. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19462
First Author [Reference No.] (Year) TR (ms) TE (ms) Timing of Arterial, Nephrographic, Delayed Phases Field Strength (T) Relative Enhancement (%) or Enhancement Ratio
Arterial Phase Nephrographic Phase

Enhancement characteristics
Sun [25] (2009) T2, 800–1100; T1 CSI, 180–205; T1 GRE, 3.8–4.5 T2, 60; T1 CSI, 2.2–2.7 and 4.5–5.2; T1 GRE, 1.8–2.0 First pass timed to CMD phase using a test bolus of 2 mL of contrast agent [35], and nephrographic phase initiated 20 s after CMD phase 1.5 32.1 ± 21.2a 96.6 ± 51.0a
Cornelis [24] (2014) T2, 2112; T1 GRE, 182; dynamic GRE, 3.9; DWI, 1500 T2, 100; T1 GRE, 4.6–2.3; dynamic GRE, 1.8; DWI, 76 0, 40, 120, 250 s 1.5 0.2973a 0.3113a
Pedrosa [23] (2008) T2, 800–1100; T1 CSI, 180–205; T1 GRE, 3.8–4.5 T2, 60; T1 CSI, 2.2–2.7 and 4.5–5.2; T1 GRE, 1.8–2.0 Timed to arterial phase and then in nephrographic phase (20 s after CMD phase) 1.5 NA NA
Sevcenco [27] (2014) 2.88 1.44 No timing details; unenhanced, arterial (CMD), venous (nephrographic), and delayed (excretory) phases 3 77 ± 78 NA
Chandarana [20] (2012) 3.3–4.5 1.4–1.9 Acquisition delays were TTP for CMD phase, TTP plus 60 s for nephrographic phase, and TTP plus 180 s for excretory phase 1.5 55.9 ± 51.2a (ROI) 59.7 ± 50.4a (ROI)
Cupido [19] (2017)a FISP, 3.6; T1 dual-phase, 136 (in-phase and out-of-phase); HASTE and fat-suppressed HASTE, infinite; VIBE, 4.3 FISP, 1.83; T1 dual-echo, 4.7 (in-phase) and 2.03 (out-of-phase); HASTE and fat-suppressed HASTE, 90; VIBE, 1.68 0, 30, 69 s 1.5 Tumor-to-cortex ratio (in whichever phase the enhancement value was maximal), 0.34 ± 0.09b NA
Sasiwimonphan [16] (2012)c T2, 2000–10,000; T1 GRE, 3.3–3.7 T2, 75–120; T2 GRE, 1.4–1.6 Arterial phase calculated using a 2-mL test bolus; no timing details for CMD phase; 3-min delay 1.5, 3 Arterial to delayed enhancement ratio, 1.5 NA
T2 signal-intensity characteristics
Oliva [22] (2009) T2, 1200–1500; T1 GRE, 260–435; 3D GRE, 4.4–7.3 T2, 87–92; T1 GRE, 4.2; 3D GRE, 1.5–2.2 No timing details 1.5 T1 SI ratios, 0.86 ± 0.23 and 0.82 ± 0.3a NA
Fu [4] (2016) Multicenter study so parameters varied 20–30, 75–80, 120–180 s 1.5 NA NA
Signal loss on opposed-phase imaging
Childs [26] (2014) T2, > 3000; T1 GRE, 175–225; FSPGR, 45d T2, 85; T1 GRE, 2.1–4.2; FSPGR, 4.7 20–30, 60, 90 s after bolus 1.5 NA NA
Yoshimitsu [17] (2006) T2, 2500; T1 GRE, 140; CSI, 150; 3D GRE, 4.2 T2, 100; T1 GRE, 4.2; CSI, 2.3; 3D GRE, 1.8 30, 90, 240 s after bolus 1.5 NA NA
Murray [21] (2016) 55 and 64 for local MRI examinations; values varied at outside institutions NA 1.5, 3 NA NA
DWI
Ponhold [18] (2016) T2, 2000; DWI, 1700 T2, 95; DWI, 73 NA 3 NA NA

Note—T2 = T2-weighted, T1 = T1-weighted, CSI = chemical-shift imaging, GRE = gradient-recalled echo, CMD = corticomedullary, NA = not applicable, TTP = time-to-peak, FISP = fast imaging with steady-state precession, VIBE = volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, SI = signal intensity, FSPGR = fast spoiled gradient echo.

a

Mean ± SD.

b

Mean (95% CI).

c

Also reported sensitivity and specificity for use of T2 signal-intensity characteristics to identify papillary renal cell carcinoma.

d

The following additional sequences were performed: single-shot fast spin-echo, dual-gradient GRE, and liver acquisition with volume acceleration (LAVA, GE Healthcare).