Table 2:

Description of functional connectivity changes in the resting-state and task-performing groups after regression of the resting-state QPP and after regression of the task-performing QPP. For the resting-state and task-performing groups separately, when comparing significant changes in functional connectivity after regression of the resting-state QPP and after regression of the task-performing QPP, the first column shows the percent distribution of the different directions the functional connectivity changes occurred in, the second column shows the mean magnitude shift in strength of Pearson correlation for each of the directions, and the third column shows the total number of ROI connections with a significant change in functional connectivity between groups. Regression of the task-performing QPP from the resting-state scans showed a 98% decrease in significant functional connectivity changes when compared to regression of the resting-state QPP form resting-state scans. Regression of the resting-state QPP from the task-performing scans showed an 82% decrease in significant functional connectivity changes when compared to regression of the task-performing QPP from task-performing scans.

	FC changes		Original functional scans			After regression of native QPPs
Resting-state	Increases	− → +	22%	⬆ 0.18	4,271	60%	⬆ 0.15	139
		+ → +	7%	⬆ 0.14		27%	⬆ 0.15
		− → −	71%	⬆ 0.16		13%	⬆ 0.13
	Decreases	+ → −	35%	⬇ 0.18	4,391	26%	⬇ 0.14	49
		− → −	21%	⬇ 0.15		33%	⬇ 0.14
		+ → −	44%	⬇ 0.16		41%	⬇ 0.16
Task-performing	Increases	− → +	26%	⬆ 0.16	553	8%	⬆ 0.15	2,481
		+ → +	27%	⬆ 0.16		2%	⬆ 0.13
		− → −	47%	⬆ 0.14		90%	⬆ 0.19
	Decreases	+ → −	18%	⬇ 0.15	508	29%	⬇ 0.16	3,275
		− → −	61%	⬇ 0.15		6%	⬇ 0.13
		+ → +	21%	⬇ 0.15		65%	⬇ 0.17