Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 29;9:5357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41605-3

Table 2.

Association of three SNPs with GDM risk.

Genotype Cases (N = 964)a Controls (N = 1021)a Adjusted OR P c
N N (95% CI)c
rs10830962 (C > G)
  CC 278 316 1.00
  CG 468 504 1.07 (0.87–1.32) 0.518
  GG 206 182 1.36 (1.04–1.76) 0.022
Dominant model
  CC 278 316 1.00
  CG/GG 674 686 1.15 (0.94–1.40) 0.175
Recessive model
  CC/CG 746 820 1.00
  GG 206 182 1.30 (1.04–1.63) 0.023
Additive model 1.16 (1.02–1.31) 0.029
rs1470579 (A > C)
  AA 507 546 1.00
  AC 371 401 0.97 (0.80–1.17) 0.742
  CC 71 52 1.42 (0.97–2.09) 0.073
Dominant model
  AA 507 546 1.00
  AC/CC 442 453 1.02 (0.85–1.22) 0.824
Recessive model
  AA/AC 878 947 1.00
  CC 71 52 1.44 (0.99–2.10) 0.057
Additive model 1.07 (0.93–1.24) 0.349
rs7754840 (G > C)
  GG 310 353
  GC 449 461 1.09 (0.89–1.33) 0.420
  CC 185 182 1.15 (0.89–1.50) 0.284
Dominant model
  GG 310 353 1.00
  GC/CC 634 643 1.11 (0.91–1.34) 0.302
Recessive model
  GG/GC 759 814 1.00
  CC 185 182 1.10 (0.87–1.38) 0.429
Additive model 1.08 (0.95–1.22) 0.262

aMajor homozygote/heterozygote/minor homozygote.

bMAF, minor allele frequency among controls.

cAdjusted by age, prepregnancy BMI, parity, abnormal pregnancy history and family history of diabetes.