Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 17;2019:7267062. doi: 10.1155/2019/7267062

(b) Characteristics of the included studies

First Author (Year of Publication) Outcomes Follow-up PRF Preparation
technique
RBH (mm)
Nizam N, 2018 Primary outcomes: newly formed bone, residual bone graft, and newly formed bone-to-bone contact
Secondary outcomes: clinical and radiographic data (6 months after augmentation; implant survival rate 12 months after implant loading)
12 months A table centrifuge (Nüve Laboratory Equipment, NF200, Ankara, Turkey)
or 12 min at 400 × g
Test: 2.45 ± 0.79
Control:
2.53± 0.61

Zhang Y, 2012 New bone formation: percentage of residual bone substitute contact length between newly formed bone and bone substitute 6 months PRF by Choukroun's Procedure (300 g for 10 min) < 5

Comert K S, 2017 Primary outcomes: new bone formation, mean percentages of residual graft particle area, percentages of soft tissue, and no postoperative maxillary sinus infection
Secondary outcomes: mean densities of bone cells (osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and osteoprogenitors), capillary vessels, and inflammatory cells
Control group: 6.14±0.57
months;
P-PRP group: 6.08±0.67 months;
PRF group: 6.29±0.53 months
PRF by Choukroun's Procedure (3000 rpm for 10 min) < 7

Tatullo M, 2012 New bone; complications; ISQ values (Implant Stability Quotient); bone density; clinical success rate 150 days Choukroun's procedure < 5

Gurler G, 2016 Healing Index (HI) scores
Inflammatory and infectious reactions
Patient comfort
14 days Centrifuge (IntraSpin, USA)
at 2700 rpm for 12 min
NA

RBH: residual bone height.