Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 18;2017(6):CD004637. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004637.pub2

Summary of findings 4. Head‐to‐head comparisons of antibiotics for prophylaxis in elective abdominal hysterectomy.

Head‐to‐head comparisons of antibiotics for prophylaxis in elective abdominal hysterectomy
Population: women having elective abdominal hysterectomy
 Settings: hospital
 Intervention: antibiotics
 Comparison: alternative antibiotics
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks Relative effect
 (95% CI) Number of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Antibiotics vs alternative antibiotics
  • Total postoperative infections ‐ early and late

  • Abdominal wound infection

  • Urinary tract infection

  • Pelvic infection

  • Other serious infections

  • Postoperative fever

  • No clear evidence of differences between groups

  • cephalosporin vs penicillin (1 RCT, 220 women)

  • penicillin plus antiprotozoal vs penicillin only (2 RCT, 155 women)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low1,2  
  • Total adverse effects

  • No data reported on adverse effects

   
CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate

aDowngraded two levels for very serious imprecision with very few events and wide confidence intervals
 bDowngraded one level for serious risk of bias: methods were poorly reported in most studies