Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 18;2017(6):CD004637. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004637.pub2

Comparison 5. Sulphonamides versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Abdominal wound infection 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Abdominal hysterectomy 2 119 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.23 [0.35, 4.35]
2 Urinary tract infection 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Vaginal hysterectomy 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.15, 0.84]
2.2 Abdominal hysterectomy 2 157 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.18 [0.06, 0.50]
3 Pelvic infection 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Vaginal hysterectomy 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.14 [0.01, 2.63]
3.2 Abdominal hysterectomy 2 119 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.11 [0.01, 0.84]
4 Postoperative fever 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Vaginal hysterectomy 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.5 [0.26, 0.95]
4.2 Abdominal hysterectomy 2 157 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.38, 1.04]
5 Length of hospital stay 5   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1 Vaginal hysterectomy 3 276 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.86 [‐1.22, ‐0.49]
5.2 Abdominal hysterectomy 3 358 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.33 [‐1.68, ‐0.97]