Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 18;2017(6):CD004637. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004637.pub2

Crosthwaite 1985.

Methods Design: randomised double‐blinded
No. eligible: not stated
No. randomised: unclear, states "100 women participated"
No. analysed: 100
Drop‐outs/withdrawals: none described
Years of recruitment: not stated
Setting: Gynaecology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Participants Inclusion criteria: all patients undergoing hysterectomy in hospital unit
 Exclusion criteria: not stated
 Age: mean 53 years (intervention group) vs 55 years (control group)
 Type of hysterectomy: abdominal or vaginal
Interventions Treatment: 2 grams tinidazole (antiprotozoal):
Control: placebo
Route: oral
Single/multiple doses: single
Timing of doses: 12 hours preop
Outcomes Postoperative infection, early
Abdominal wound infection
Urinary tract infection
Pelvic infection
Other serious infection
Adverse effects (narrative data only)
Funding Pfizer
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomised; method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Described as "double‐blind"; method not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not categorically stated how many women were randomised
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information in the methods section to detect presence of selective reporting
Other bias Low risk Baseline demographic characteristics similar between treatment groups