Crosthwaite 1985.
Methods | Design: randomised double‐blinded No. eligible: not stated No. randomised: unclear, states "100 women participated" No. analysed: 100 Drop‐outs/withdrawals: none described Years of recruitment: not stated Setting: Gynaecology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: all patients undergoing hysterectomy in hospital unit Exclusion criteria: not stated Age: mean 53 years (intervention group) vs 55 years (control group) Type of hysterectomy: abdominal or vaginal | |
Interventions | Treatment: 2 grams tinidazole (antiprotozoal): Control: placebo Route: oral Single/multiple doses: single Timing of doses: 12 hours preop |
|
Outcomes | Postoperative infection, early Abdominal wound infection Urinary tract infection Pelvic infection Other serious infection Adverse effects (narrative data only) |
|
Funding | Pfizer | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomised; method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Described as "double‐blind"; method not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not categorically stated how many women were randomised |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information in the methods section to detect presence of selective reporting |
Other bias | Low risk | Baseline demographic characteristics similar between treatment groups |