Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 18;2017(6):CD004637. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004637.pub2

Hedican 1976.

Methods Design: randomised double‐blinded
No. eligible: not stated
No. randomised: 70
No. analysed: 70
Drop‐outs/withdrawals: none
Years of recruitment: 1971 to 1972
Setting: university gynaecology and obstetrics department, USA
Participants Inclusion criteria: women having elective vaginal hysterectomy
 Exclusion criteria: preoperative infection, taking antibiotics, allergy to study drugs, elevated blood urea
 Age: not stated
 Type of hysterectomy: vaginal
Interventions Treatment: cephaloridine (first‐generation cephalosporin)
Control: placebo
Route: IV, then IM
Single/multiple doses: multiple
Timing of doses: 1 gram IV at start of operation, 1 gram IM 5 hours postoperatively, 1 gram IM 12 hours postoperatively
Outcomes Postoperative infection, early
Pelvic infection
Funding Lilly Company
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk State that "patients were numbered consecutively 1‐70 and randomly assigned..."; no additional details reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Appears to be remote allocation ‐ "patients were ... randomly assigned either the placebo or the study drug by the pharmacy"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk "Following the completion of the study ... the code was broken"; no details on outcome assessment provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Appears that all participants were analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to make a conclusive judgement
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to make a conclusive judgement