. 2019 Mar 28;5(3):e01431. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01431

Table 6.

Water soluble vitamin content in the edible plants by HPLC (mg/100 g DPM).

Plants	C	B1	B2	B3	B5	B6	B9
I. aqatica	ND	0.454 ± 0.007^a	0.710 ± 0.005^c,d	ND	ND	2.419 ± 0.005^a	0.174 ± 0.006^b
A. aspera	151.75 ± 0.333^a	0.131 ± 0.003^c	0.384 ± 0.013^d,e	0.113 ± 0.006^c	ND	1.227 ± 0.003^d	0.074 ± 0.002^c
A. ganjetica	1.507 ± 0.001^c	0.007 ± 0.001^f	2.511 ± 0.006^a	ND	ND	0.759 ± 0.010^e	0.077 ± 0.001^c
E. fluctuans	ND	0.404 ± 0.003^b	1.043 ± 0.002^b	0.604 ± 0.002^a	ND	1.850 ± 0.004^b	0.050 ± 0.005^d
O. corumbosa	3.791 ± 0.005^b	0.049 ± 0.001^d,e	0.472 ± 0.011^d	ND	ND	1.278 ± 0.001^c,d	0.245 ± 0.002^a
A. viridis	ND	0.044 ± 0.003^d,e	0.012 ± 0.001^f	0.258 ± 0.003^b	ND	1.308 ± 0.011^c	0.038 ± 0.004^e

Each value in the table was obtained by calculating the average of three experiments and data are presented as Mean ± SEM ND: Not detected.

Statistical analysis were carried out by Turkeys test at 95% confidence level and statistical significance were accepted at the p < 0.05 level. The superscript letter a, b, c d, e, f denotes the significance of various parameters. Letter a is significant to b, c, d, e, f.