Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 29;5(3):e01416. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01416

Table 2.

Effect of AA and MBA ratio on GCP, % GCE and water Absorbency (SEQ).

Grafting parameter AA content (% v/v) MBA content (% w/v)
0.250 0.375 0.500 0.625 0.750
GCP 4.50 Weak 72 (6.0) 126 (5.1) 167 (5.0) 218 (11.0)
5.75 174 (9.5) 214 (11.5) 253 (14.5) 302 (11.0) 346 (12.5)
6.75 265 (12.6) 295 (12.0) 371 (16.0) 433 (12.6) 552 (17.5)
7.75 290 (13.5) 333 (16.0) 413 (13.5) 458 (12.5) 567 (23.0)
9.00 553 (21.5) 557 (20.5) 559 (23.5) 565 (24.5) 693 (22.0)
% GCE 4.50 Weak 41 (0.6) 68 (2.1) 78 (3.1) 83 (0.6)
5.75 72 (2.5) 77 (2.6) 80 (3.5) 86 (1.0) 89 (2.0)
6.75 76 (2.4) 80 (2.5) 85 (3.6) 95 (2.1) 97 (1.0)
7.75 69 (3.5) 74 (1.6) 83 (3.0) 85 (2.5) 97 (2.5)
9.00 52 (2.1) 58 (2.5) 60 (3.1) 74 (4.0) 82 (2.1)
SEQ 4.50 Weak 33 (3.1) 55 (2.1) 42 (1.5) 41 (4.4)
5.75 99 (1.2) 104 (3.5) 100 (3.5) 85 (3.6) 69 (1.5)
6.75 142 (5.0) 151 (3.0) 156 (5.3) 139 (2.5) 95 (2.1)
7.75 139 (2.0) 145 (1.5) 107 (4.0) 98 (1.6) 79 (1.0)
9.00 121 (3.5) 120 (2.2) 108 (3.6) 77 (2.7) 68 (2.6)

Notes: The values in parentheses are standard deviations (n = 3), reaction conditions; Degree of neutralization = 80 %, temp. = 80 °C, cellulose = 2 % w/v, APS = 0.25 % w/v, vol. = 40 mL, time = 2 h.