Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 2;41:571–583. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.060

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Predicted probability of BK-virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients.

Predicted probability(a,e) calculated as the median of the set of probabilities estimated for each patient of the development dataset in the 50 repeats of the cross-validation cycles (Step 12 of Note 1 in Supplementary Discussion) or (b,c,d,f,g) based on the newly-developed six-gene signature (Supplementary Fig. S11); ABMR – antibody-mediated rejection (category 2 according to Banff’09 classification); BKVN – BK virus nephropathy (confirmed with a specialised histological staining); TCMR – T-cell-mediated rejection (category 4); Mixed – histological features of both, ABMR and TCMR; TCMR+ − patients with TCMR only or with mixed-type histology; Stable – patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria listed in Table 1; Non-rejector – patients not fulfilling the selection criteria in Table 1 but without clinical or histological evidence of TCMR, ABMR or BKVN up to day 400 post-transplantation; dot colour: black – rejectors, grey – stable or non-rejector patients; dot shape - induction agent in KALIBRE patients: circle – Basiliximab, triangle – Rituximab, square – Alemtuzumab; dotted lines - cut-off 0.2 for dichotomous classification of the probability of BKVN; samples: rejectors - single pre-biopsy sample, BKVN –single near-biopsy sample, stable/non-rejector patients – summary (median per patients) of longitudinal samples covering between days four and 400 post transplantation; (a) Discovery – training patients used in TCMR signature development (TCMR (n = 27) fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria listed in Table 1 and stable patients (n = 27)); (b) Validation – test patients from the KALIBRE study used for TCMR signature validation (Mixed-type rejectors (n = 9) and new stable patients (n = 17)); (c) External – patients from the independent trial EMPIRIKAL used for TSMR signature validation (rejectors (n = 9) with TCMR or Mixed-type histology and non-rejectors (n = 15)); (d) PreTx – cross-sectional pre-transplantation samples - one per patient from rejectors with TCMR (n = 16) and Mixed-type (n = 2) histology and training stable patients from the signature development dataset (n = 20); (e) ABMR rejectors (n = 5), RitCam rejectors with alternative induction and TCMR (n = 6) or Mixed-type (n = 2) histology; BKVN patients: grey dots BKVN (n = 7) included in the BKVN signature development dataset, crossed dots BKVN: +dot (n = 2) excluded from the training dataset due to prior suspected TCMR or some genes missing, x-dot (n = 1) Alemtuzumab induction, x (n = 1) a patient from the EMPIRICAL trial; (f) – cross-sectional pre-biopsy samples (up to 15 days prior to the first post-transplantation biopsy (median two days) and a single one at 25 days) from patients which did not show features of rejection at least up to three months post biopsy; Cat – histological category according to Banff’09 classification (Cat.1 – normal (n = 8, three (38%) BKVN-positive), Cat.3 – borderline changes (n = 33, eight (24%) BKVN-positive), Cat.5 - interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (n = 10, four (40%) BKVN-positive), Cat.6 – other non-rejection histology (n = 38, 11 (29%) BKVN-positive)); star dots (*) – patients with histological features of borderline changes treated for rejection due to clinical considerations; (g) – summary (median per patient) of longitudinal validation follow-up samples from non-rejectors with different induction agents: Basiliximab induction (n = 35, six (17%) BKVN-positive median), Rituximab (n = 18, four (22%) BKVN-positive), Alemtuzumab (n = 9, seven (78%) BKVN-positive median); p-values derived from a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests.