Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;7:1745. Originally published 2018 Nov 5. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16715.2

Table 2. Comparison of run times for three simulation setups with different nonbonded force treatment: single-range scheme (SR) and twin-range scheme with constant-force application (TR CFA) using a Nosé-Hoover (NH) thermostat.

All systems were simulated for 0.4 ns on 1 CPU with 4 cores. A time step of 2 fs was used. The pairlist was generated using the standard charge-group based algorithm of the GROMOS program. The simulated system consists of 2002 chloroform and 8129 water molecules.

Force splitting n m n p Run time [h]
TR CFA 5 5 6.1
SR 1 5 11.4
SR 1 20 8.8