Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2018 Feb 12;30(7):847–856. doi: 10.1037/pas0000531

Table 3.

Correlations between BIS-Brief and BIS-11 Scores and Performance-Based Construct Validity Measures

BIS-11
 BIS-Brief
Mean
(SD)		 r [95% CI] p, n r [95% CI] p, n
IMT Ratio 62.60
(17.61)		 .14 [.08, .20]
< .001; 974		 .12 [.06, .18]
< .001; 974
GoStop Ratio 48.66
(25.53)		 .14 [.08, .20]
< .001; 976		 .10 [.04, .16]
.002; 976
TCIP Proportion Short 0.30
(0.23)		 .16 [.10, .22]
< .001; 977		 .12 [.05, .18]
< .001; 977
Delay Discounting, Average K .05
(0.60)		 .12 [.02, .22]
.02; 383		 .11 [.01, .21]
.03; 383
BART-Y Adjusted Average Pumps 32.48
(13.26)		 -.02 [−.12, .08]
.88; 381		 -.01 [−.11, .09]
.88; 381
AVAS Performance 63.82
(22.34)		 -.34 [−.40, −.28]
< .001; 860		 -.35 [−.40, −.29]
< .001; 860
AVAS Effort 76.76
(23.17)		 -.15 [−.21, −.08]
< .001; 860		 -.16 [−.22, −.09]
< .001; 860

Note. AVAS = Adaptive Visual Analog Scales; BART-Y = Balloon Analogue Risk Task – Youth; GoStop = GoStop Impulsivity Paradigm; IMT = Immediate Memory Task; TCIP = Two Choice Impulsivity Paradigm.