Belet 2004.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Treatment group 3
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details of how sequence was generated, states randomised by drawing lots |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing data evident, no losses during follow‐up reported |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Primary outcome is appropriate |
| Other bias | High risk | Age of TMP/SMX group was significantly higher than the other two groups |