Carlsen 1985.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Cross‐over
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details reported |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | States "randomly allocated' but no other details |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Withdrawals detailed, 11/35 did not complete the study and were not analysed |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Primary outcome is positive culture, not symptomatic UTI |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Many details missing |