Liern 2011.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group (one of 3 antibiotics)
Control group
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation was performed using the statistical program EPIDAT.3.0, creating two groups |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation was unlikely to be manipulated but treatment arm was known |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 8/58 lost to follow‐up, no data given |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Unclear reporting of repeat symptomatic UTIs |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Translation is imperfect and might contribute to uncertainty in details |