| Methods |
Study design: open‐label parallel RCT
Duration of study: May 2000 to August 2006
Duration of follow‐up: 12 months
|
| Participants |
Country: Italy
Setting: multicentre (22 sites)
Children with normal kidney function and 1st febrile UTI, pyuria ≥ 25 cells/µL on 2 consecutive urine samples and urine culture 1 organism ≥ 108 CFU/L on 2 consecutive bag samples; 2 urinalysis results had to be concordant; symptoms had to at least 2 of: fever > 38°C, ESR > 30 mm in 1 standard hour or CRP ≥ 3 times upper limit of normal and neutrophil count above normal
Number: treatment group (127); control group (211)
Mean age ± SD (months): treatment group (14.7 ± 15.5); control group (14.7 ± 15.5)
Sex (M/F): treatment group (37/90); control group (67/144)
Exclusion criteria: complex urologic malformations, and/or severe renal damage (DMSA < 30% relative function).
|
| Interventions |
Treatment group 1
Control group
|
| Outcomes |
|
| Notes |
|
| Risk of bias |
| Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Computer generated by the coordinating centre |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Allocation unable to be manipulated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Unblinded, open label |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Unsure for UTI, DMSA scans read blind to treatment |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Lost to follow‐up accounted for (10/127 and 16/211) |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Primary outcome appropriate |
| Other bias |
Low risk |
Well reported study |