Smellie 1978.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Control group
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Study was described as randomised, method of randomisation was not reported |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Treatment allocation know to clinician, possibly manipulatable more children with a history of prior UTIs received prophylaxis |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Treatment allocation was known to clinician |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Losses to follow‐up detailed |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Reports asymptomatic and symptomatic UTI just can't tell in what time frame the single asymptomatic UTI occurred |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Many methods details are not detailed |