Stansfeld 1975.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Cotrimoxazole given for 2 weeks and then randomised to treatment or control Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Sequence generated and held in pharmacy, independent to investigators |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Clinician unable to manipulate allocation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | States double blinding and used a placebo |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Loss to follow‐up detailed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Primary outcome positive culture, not symptomatic UTI |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Many methods poorly reported |
CFU ‐ colony forming units; CRP ‐ C‐reactive protein; ESR‐ erythrocyte sedimentation rate; DMSA ‐ 99Tc‐dimercaptosuccinic acid; G6PD ‐ glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase; M/F ‐ male/female; MSU ‐ midstream urine; RCT ‐ randomised controlled trial; SD ‐ standard deviation; SE ‐ standard error; SMX ‐ sulfamethoxazole; TMP ‐ trimethoprim; UTI ‐ urinary tract infection; VUR ‐ vesicoureteric reflux