2. Dosage of comparison interventions.

Study	Therapist‐led (hours)	Parent‐led (hours)	Total therapy (hours)	Forced use (hours)	Total therapy + forced use (hours)
Low dose
Abootalebi 2010	6.75	Not reported	6.75	‐	6.75
Al‐Oraibi 2011	16	Not reported	16	‐	16
Charles 2006	0	0	0	‐	0
Choudhary 2013	9.33	Time not specified	9.33	‐	9.33
de Brito Brandão 2010	2.25	0	2.25	‐	2.25
Dong 2017	7.5	0	7.5	‐	7.5
Eliasson 2011	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	‐	0
Eliasson 2018	0	Time not specified	Not reported	‐	Not reported
Eugster‐Buesch 2012	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	‐	0
Facchin 2011	15	Not reported	15	‐	15
Gharib 2010	13.5	Not reported	13.5	‐	13.5
Hosseini 2010	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	‐	0
Rostami 2012b	4	Not reported	4	‐	4
Sabour 2012	4.5	Not reported	4.5	‐	4.5
Taub 2004	6.6	Not reported	6.6	‐	6.6
Taub 2011	6.75	Not reported	6.75	‐	6.75
Yu 2012	10	Not reported	10	‐	10
High dose
Chen 2014	30	0	30	‐	30
Hoare 2013	14	16.2	30.2	‐	30.2
Sakzewski 2015a	9	36	45	‐	45
Wallen 2011	8	36.8	44.8	‐	44.8
Dose‐matched
Aarts 2010	12	89.6	101.6	‐	101.6
Abd El‐Kafy 2014	120	Time not specified	120	‐	120
Deppe 2013	80	0	80	‐	80
Dong 2017	15	60	75	‐	75
Facchin 2011	90	120	210	‐	210
Gelkop 2015	96	Not reported	96	‐	96
Gordon 2011	90	15	105	‐	105
Kirton 2016a (CIMT + r TMS)	80	10	90	‐	90
Rostami 2012b	22	Not reported	22	‐	22
Sakzewski 2011	60	0	60	‐	60
Sakzewski 2015b	30	Not reported	30	‐	30
Smania 2009	10	Time not specified	10	‐	10
Sung 2005	6	Not reported	6	‐	6
Xu 2012	30	10	40	‐	40
Zafer 2016	2	22	26	‐	26
Different form of CIMT
Christmas 2018	0	42	42	0	42
DeLuca 2012	63	0	63	149	212
Rostami 2012a	15	10	168	143	311