Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 1;13(2):120–133. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.180147

Table 1.

Comparison of union, refracture and probability of union without refracture rates amongst different published studies for different methods of treatment

Patients (n) Primary union rate (%) Refracture rate (%) Success probability (%) Other
Rodding
Birke et al 201027 8 75 0 75 BMP
Das et al 201428 20 90 25 68 BMP
Dobbs et al 200422 21 86 57 37
Johnston 200229 23 22 0 22
Joseph and Matthew 200030 14 21 5 20
Joseph et al 200331 26 73 15 62
Kim and Weinstein 200232 11 36 50 18
Liu et al 201833 42 95 26 67
Stephens Richards and Anderson 201834 21 76 31 24 BMP
Vigouroux et al 201735 10 40 30 12
Total/Mean 196 61 24 40
Ilizarov
Boero et al 199736 21 81 19 66
Borzunov et al 201637 28 100 61 49
El-Rosasy et al 200110 17 100 68 32
Hissnauer et al 201738 7 86 50 43 BMP
Ohnishi et al 200539 26 100 15 85
Paley et al 199240 16 94 31 65
Total/Mean 115 93.5 41 57
Ilizarov + Rodding
Agashe et al 201241 15 40 17 33
Shabtai et al 201542 10 80 0 80 BMP
Thabet et al 200814 20 100 40 60
Yan et al 201743 51 51 0 51
Zhu et al 201644 56 89 26 66
Total/Mean 152 72 17 58
Free vascularized fibula graft
Grill et al 200059 31 61 16 51
Kalra and Agarwal 201245 26 92.6 15 79
Vigouroux et al 201735 8 38 0 38
Weiland et al 199046 19 74 14 64
Total/Mean 84 66 11 58
Mean all groups 72 24 50.7