Table 1.
Demographic description of participants involved in CI and Q-sorting interviews phases of the study.
| Collective interviews participants | Q-sorting interviews participants | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n = 198) | Chicken farmers (n = 49) | Meat duck farmers (n = 30) | Free-ranging ducks farmers (n = 46) | Farmers' advisors (n = 73) | Total (n = 54) | Chicken farmers (n = 11) | Meat duck farmers (n = 8) | Free-ranging duck farmers (n = 9) | Farmers' advisors (n = 26) | |
| Age in years [median [interquartile range]] | 41.0 [34.0–50.0] | 45.0 [35.0–54.0] | 44.0 [37.0–51.5] | 42.5 [37.0–47.8] | 35.0 [33.0–43.0] | 43.0 [34.3–51.0] | 51.0 [48.5–62.0] | 41.0 [32.0–51.8] | 46.0 [42.0–53.0] | 38.0 [33.5–43.0] |
| GENDER | ||||||||||
| Male (%) | 178 (89.9) | 43 (87.8) | 29 (96.7) | 45 (97.8) | 61 (83.6) | 48 (88.9) | 10 (90.9) | 8 (100.0) | 9 (100.0) | 21 (80.8) |
| Female (%) | 20 (10.1) | 6 (12.2) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (2.2) | 12 (16.4) | 6 (11.1) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (19.2) |
| DISTRICT | ||||||||||
| Cao Lanh (%) | 43 (21.7) | 10 (20.4) | 7 (23.3) | 9 (19.6) | 17 (23.3) | 15 (27.8) | 2 (18.2) | 2 (25.0) | 2 (22.2) | 9 (34.6) |
| Lap Vo (%) | 43 (21.7) | 7 (14.3) | 9 (30.0) | 11 (23.9) | 16 (21.9) | 10 (18.5) | 1 (9.1) | 2 (25.0 | 2 (22.2) | 5 (19.2) |
| Tam Nong (%) | 40 (20.2) | 9 (18.4) | 0 (0.0) | 18 (39.1) | 13 (17.8) | 7 (13.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (33.3) | 4 (15.4) |
| Thanh Binh (%) | 25 (12.6) | 5 (10.2) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (17.4) | 12 (16.4) | 8 (14.8) | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (22.2) | 4 (15.4) |
| Thap Muoi (%) | 47 (23.7) | 18 (36.7) | 14 (46.7) | 0 (0.0) | 15 (20.5) | 14 (25.9) | 6 (54.5) | 4 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (15.4) |