Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;30(3):424–430. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy550

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Alternate promoter utilization in gastric cancer (pembrolizumab trial cohort, n = 37). (A) Heatmap of alternate promoter utilization. Transcript with higher than fourfold expression level compared with the median level in all tumor and mapping to the previously identified gain alternative promoter site were considered as gained alternative promoter (marked red in the heatmap). Transcript with lower than fourfold expression level compared with the median level in all tumor and mapping to the previously identified lost alternative promoter site were considered as lost alternative promoter (marked blue in the heatmap). (B) Alternative promoter utilization score is calculated as the sum of gained and lost alternative promoter in each sample. High alternate promoter utilization was defined as those >66th centile. (C) Association between high alternate promoter (APhigh) group and low alternate promoter (APlow) group with T-cell immune correlates. APhigh group are in red, whereas those in APlow group are in blue. Depicted are the expression of T-cell markers CD8A (P =0.0037) and the T-cell cytolytic markers GZMA (P =0.0055) and PRF1 (P =0. 016). APhigh group shows lower expression of immune markers. (D) Waterfall plot of response to pembrolizumab according to APhigh (red) and APlow (blue) subgroups. Y axis represents percentage of maximum tumor reduction assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.